2012
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.16.2.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Effects of the Use of Non-Rigid Tools for Postural Control by Adults with Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract: We tested the short-term effects of a nonrigid tool, identified as an "anchor system" (e.g., ropes attached to varying weights resting on the floor), on the postural stabilization of blindfolded adults with and without intellectual disabilities (ID). Participants held a pair of anchors-one in each hand, under three weight conditions (250 g, 500 g and 1,000 g), while they performed a restricted balance task (standing for 30 s on a balance beam placed on top of a force platform). These conditions were called anc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study with adults with and without intellectual disability, Mauerberg-deCastro et al (2012) again found that the anchor system was efficient as an aid for postural tasks, reducing the path length of the COP when comparing pre-and post-practice without the anchors. The adults with and without disabilities improved their postural performance equally when using the anchors, in contrast to the pre-practice trial.…”
Section: Are There Practical Applications For An Anchor Paradigm?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study with adults with and without intellectual disability, Mauerberg-deCastro et al (2012) again found that the anchor system was efficient as an aid for postural tasks, reducing the path length of the COP when comparing pre-and post-practice without the anchors. The adults with and without disabilities improved their postural performance equally when using the anchors, in contrast to the pre-practice trial.…”
Section: Are There Practical Applications For An Anchor Paradigm?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two other studies that used the anchor system, various levels of task difficulty 3 in the postural task were tested in individuals with intellectual disability (Mauerberg-deCastro, Moraes, & Campbell, 2012;Mauerberg-deCastro et al, 2010). The primary rationale for testing these individuals was to demonstrate whether or not the use of the anchors required higher levels of cognitive processing.…”
Section: Experimental Evidence Of "Smart" Anchoring Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, we suggested that this limitation in transfer effect could be the result of the walking task's low level of difficulty. Benefits of the anchors are less evident during the practice of simple postural tasks (e.g., standing with feet apart) as compared to tasks that challenged balance control (e.g., standing with one foot, with feet together, or with eyes closed) [10,17]. Our previous study [7] showed that tandem walking in a straight line on level ground was not challenging enough for the participants to exploit the additional haptic input provided by the anchors, although this task caused destabilization of their posture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in body orientation relative to the support surface are detected by variations of pressure exerted on the skin by the anchor cable. Adults with intellectual deficiency benefited from additional haptic information provided by the anchor system, and reduced body sway 13,14 . Older adults, likewise, have reduced body sway with the anchor system 3,15,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%