2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term electricity prices forecasting in a competitive market by a hybrid PSO–ANFIS approach

Abstract: In this paper, a novel hybrid approach is proposed for electricity prices forecasting in a competitive market, considering a time horizon of one week. The proposed approach is based on the combination of particle swarm optimization and adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system. Results from a case study based on the electricity market of mainland Spain are presented. A thorough comparison is carried out, taking into account the results of previous publications, to demonstrate its effectiveness regarding fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This comparative table clearly strengthens the fact that the ARIMA-based two-stage model is a promising forecasting method to improve the accuracies in residual training for short-term price forecasting. [47] 13.39 Neural Network-40 days [48] 11.40 Weighted Nearest Neighbor-23 months [49] 10.89 Wavelet-ARIMA with 4 Variables-47 days [50] 10.70 Fuzzy Neural Network [51] 9.84 Adaptive Wavelet Neural Network with 2 variables [52] 9.64 Neural network Wavelet Transform with 1 variable [53] 9.5 WNF with 1 variable-42 days [54] 9.47 Elman Network [55] 9.09 Hybrid Intelligent systems with 3 Variables 7.47 Wavelet-ARIMA-RBFN 6.76 Hybrid wavelet-PSO-ANFIS [56] 6.50 Cascaded Neuro-evolutionary Algorithm with 2 variables-50 days [57] 5.79 Table 9 categorizes the MAPE results as good, average and bad for easy classification of readers. MAPE results between 1-4.99% are termed as good results, while MAPE results between 5-9.99% is classified as average results.…”
Section: Mapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comparative table clearly strengthens the fact that the ARIMA-based two-stage model is a promising forecasting method to improve the accuracies in residual training for short-term price forecasting. [47] 13.39 Neural Network-40 days [48] 11.40 Weighted Nearest Neighbor-23 months [49] 10.89 Wavelet-ARIMA with 4 Variables-47 days [50] 10.70 Fuzzy Neural Network [51] 9.84 Adaptive Wavelet Neural Network with 2 variables [52] 9.64 Neural network Wavelet Transform with 1 variable [53] 9.5 WNF with 1 variable-42 days [54] 9.47 Elman Network [55] 9.09 Hybrid Intelligent systems with 3 Variables 7.47 Wavelet-ARIMA-RBFN 6.76 Hybrid wavelet-PSO-ANFIS [56] 6.50 Cascaded Neuro-evolutionary Algorithm with 2 variables-50 days [57] 5.79 Table 9 categorizes the MAPE results as good, average and bad for easy classification of readers. MAPE results between 1-4.99% are termed as good results, while MAPE results between 5-9.99% is classified as average results.…”
Section: Mapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the other data sets are used, comparison is performed over the test sets. In the comparison of the methods, mean square error (MSE) calculated for the training sets while root mean square error (RMSE) given in (11), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) given in (12), median absolute percentage error (MdAPE) given in (13) and direction accuracy (DA) given in (14) are calculated for the test sets.…”
Section: The Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lohani et al [10] compared ANFIS with autoregressive model and multilayer perceptron for river flow data. Particle swarm optimization was used to obtain membership function optimal parameters in the study of Pousinho et al [11]. Cheng [12] proposed OWA based ANFIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is really difficult for electricity price forecasting handlers. To solve this issue, an intelligent optimization algorithm is usually used to automatically determine the parameters of artificial intelligent forecasting models, such as particle swam optimization (PSO) [19,20] and genetic algorithm (GA) [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%