2007
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5446-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term fo F2 Forecast: Present Day State of Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although theoretical models (e.g., Crowley et al, 1996;Daniell et al, 1995) could be considered as powerful tools for physical analyses providing real input in the understanding of the mechanisms that govern the ionospheric formation under various geophysical conditions, they hardly offer real contribution in operational applications (Mikhailov et al, 2007). On the other hand, the empirical approach based on the correlation between the ionospheric disturbances and the level of the geomagnetic activity as it is described by various geomagnetic activity indices (Fuller-Rowell et al, 2000b;Fuller-Rowell et al, 2002;Muhtarov, 2001 a, b, 2003;Muhtarov and Kutiev, 1999;Muhtarov et al, 2002;Tsagouri and Belehaki, 2006), is widely used in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although theoretical models (e.g., Crowley et al, 1996;Daniell et al, 1995) could be considered as powerful tools for physical analyses providing real input in the understanding of the mechanisms that govern the ionospheric formation under various geophysical conditions, they hardly offer real contribution in operational applications (Mikhailov et al, 2007). On the other hand, the empirical approach based on the correlation between the ionospheric disturbances and the level of the geomagnetic activity as it is described by various geomagnetic activity indices (Fuller-Rowell et al, 2000b;Fuller-Rowell et al, 2002;Muhtarov, 2001 a, b, 2003;Muhtarov and Kutiev, 1999;Muhtarov et al, 2002;Tsagouri and Belehaki, 2006), is widely used in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed variations (Kutiev and Muhtarov, 2003). Moreover the utilization of geomagnetic indices to ionospheric prediction models may cause a number of complications that arise from the following two facts a) geomagnetic indices do not provide high enough correlation with the relative f oF 2 deviation from monthly medians (Mikhailov et al, 2007); b) the only geomagnetic index which is available for real-time use is the predicted daily Ap index. The accuracy of the geomagnetic index predictability is an issue of major consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here it is worthy to note that the dependence of ionospheric forecasting capabilities on the prediction step is a common feature in many similar studies (e.g. Mikhailov et al 2007) and may be attributed to the profound diurnal variation of the foF2 parameter.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Similar results reported in the literature include accuracy gain of 29% over climatology obtained by Kutiev & Muhtarov (2001) for their prediction model and gain of 33% for STORM model . In a recent review, Mikhailov et al (2007) tested their model's performance in terms of MRE estimates. For quiet conditions typical MRE up to 10-15% were received, while during severe storm events the tests were performed in comparison to the performance of IRI2000.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation