Renewable Energy Forecasting 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100504-0.00005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term forecasting based on all-sky cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data shown covers the period on 13 July 2020. from 13:45 to 14:40 and from 12:00 to 12:45. Figures [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] show the situation in the sky where several clouds were moving towards the sun and corresponding error levels. The red curve, which represents the real-time sun un-coverage level on images that compare the real-time and predicted sun-uncoverage level, shows that the visible area of the sun changes significantly in a nonlinear manner as the clouds begin to cover or uncover the sun.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data shown covers the period on 13 July 2020. from 13:45 to 14:40 and from 12:00 to 12:45. Figures [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] show the situation in the sky where several clouds were moving towards the sun and corresponding error levels. The red curve, which represents the real-time sun un-coverage level on images that compare the real-time and predicted sun-uncoverage level, shows that the visible area of the sun changes significantly in a nonlinear manner as the clouds begin to cover or uncover the sun.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods used cloud motion prediction based on satellite images and motion vectors to predict output power, but only 30 min in advance, which may be a limitation, especially when some power storage devices in the microgrid system need more time to change their operating mode from charging to discharging [12]. A similar method has been used with several fisheye cameras but could predict up to 15 to 30 min of updates per minute [13], but our method manages to predict solar coverage up to 1 h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in this area has focused on scaling‐up these methodologies to be able to incorporate many spatial locations (Cavalcante, Bessa, Reis, & Browell, ; Messner & Pinson, ), and conditioning statistical model on large scale weather regimes for wind energy applications (Browell, Drew, & Philippopoulos, ) or cloud regimes for solar (McCandless, Haupt, & Young, ). Augmenting power production data with remote sensing is a well‐established strategy for improving solar power forecast performance via incorporation of satellite imagery (Blanc, Remund, & Vallance, ) for hours‐ahead forecasting and sky cameras (Chow et al, ; Kazantzidis et al, ) for intrahour forecasting. Similar methods are beginning to emerge in wind power forecasting with the use of LIDAR and RADAR technology to observe and advect changes in wind speed as they approach a wind farm (Trombe et al, ; Valldecabres, Nygaard, Vera‐Tudela, von Bremen, & Kühn, ; Valldecabres, Peña, Courtney, von Bremen, & Kühn, ; Würth et al, ).…”
Section: Forecasting Renewable Energy Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such spatially resolved DNI information can be provided by camera based monitoring and nowcasting systems. These systems provide an intra-minute temporal resolution and a spatial resolution ≤ 20 m. The most common nowcasting systems consist of upward-facing all sky imagers (ASI) (Chow et al 2011;Quesada-Ruiz et al 2014;Peng et al 2015;Blanc et al 2017;Kazantzidis et al 2017;Nouri et al 2019b). The principle method of these ASI systems is most often similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%