2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11102744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Load Interval Prediction Using a Deep Belief Network

Abstract: In load predication, point-based forecasting methods have been widely applied. However, uncertainties arising in load predication bring significant challenges for such methods. This therefore drives the development of new methods amongst which interval predication is one of the most effective. In this study, a deep belief network-based lower–upper bound estimation (LUBE) approach is proposed, and a genetic algorithm is applied to reinforce the search ability of the LUBE method, instead of simulated an annealin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the nonlinearity and uncertainty of the power dataset increase, the difficulty of obtaining accurate load forecasting results increases. The accuracy of the prediction results has always been a process that needs to be continuously improved, from the traditional regression prediction method to the current deep learning algorithm [23,24]. The prediction method is improving constantly.…”
Section: Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the nonlinearity and uncertainty of the power dataset increase, the difficulty of obtaining accurate load forecasting results increases. The accuracy of the prediction results has always been a process that needs to be continuously improved, from the traditional regression prediction method to the current deep learning algorithm [23,24]. The prediction method is improving constantly.…”
Section: Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using meta‐heuristic algorithms to train the LUBE models, 24,25 single objective, 7 or bi‐objective 26 functions are set by simply selecting the evaluation indexes. Heuristic algorithms including particle swarm optimization (PSO), 7,27 simulated annealing (SA), 21 a bat algorithm (BA), 19 an artificial bee algorithm, 26 and a genetic algorithm, 28 have been successfully adopted to solve the objective function in the training of LUBE models. Owing to the characteristics of swarm‐based optimization, meta‐heuristic algorithms are easy to implement and can solve many types of objective functions, even those that cannot be handled by the GD method, but may suffer from a low efficiency 29,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%