“…Changes in the ethnic structure of the country, in relation with longstanding differentials in the reproductive norms of Asians and Europeans -the present TFR is around 2.9-3.1 for Kyrgyz and Uzbeks, respectively, and 1.3 for Russians -have sometimes been regarded a possible 'trigger' for aggregate fertility increase in Kyrgyzstan and areas of it (Kumskov 2002). Recent data from the National Statistical Committee partly supports this assumption, indicating that TFR in the capital, which 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 migrants ( 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 migrants (in (Becker et al 2003, Demakov 1997, Nedoluzhko 2000, Subbotina 1997, Tishkov 1994. In contrast, internal migration and other demographic adjustments to socioeconomic adversity, like postponement of marriage formation and childbearing, have been poorly addressed (Agadjanian 1999 The composition of the study population of our analysis is presented in Table 1, which contains occurrences and exposure times, by each of the variables we apply in our modeling.…”