2011
DOI: 10.5194/bg-8-2833-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term natural δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>18</sup>O variations in pools and fluxes in a beech forest: the transfer of isotopic signal from recent photosynthates to soil respired CO<sub>2</sub>

Abstract: Abstract. The fate of photosynthetic products within the plant-soil continuum determines how long the reduced carbon resides within the ecosystem and when it returns back to the atmosphere in the form of respiratory CO 2 . We have tested the possibility of measuring natural variation in δ 13 C and δ 18 O to disentangle the potential times needed to transfer carbohydrates produced by photosynthesis down to trunk, roots and, in general, to belowground up to its further release in the form of soil respiration int… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 13 Clabelfirst appeared in roots (bulk, sugars, organic acids and amino acids) between 3 and 27 h after labelling (i.e., minimum transfer time), implying a velocity of minimum 0.02 m h −1 to a maximum of 0.3 m h −1 (due to the temporal resolution of our sampling, no exact velocity can be given). Such fast transport velocities were also observed in other pulse-labelling experiments with F. sylvatica [for overview see Epron et al (2012)]: 1 m h −1 in Plain et al ( 2009) and Gavrichkova et al (2011), 0.15-0.62 m h −1 in Kuptz et al (2011), 0.22-1.21 m h −1 in Dannoura et al (2011). At the same time, the minimum velocity of 0.02 m h −1 is in the range as found for beech saplings under drought by Ruehr et al (2009).…”
Section: Carbon Allocation Velocitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The 13 Clabelfirst appeared in roots (bulk, sugars, organic acids and amino acids) between 3 and 27 h after labelling (i.e., minimum transfer time), implying a velocity of minimum 0.02 m h −1 to a maximum of 0.3 m h −1 (due to the temporal resolution of our sampling, no exact velocity can be given). Such fast transport velocities were also observed in other pulse-labelling experiments with F. sylvatica [for overview see Epron et al (2012)]: 1 m h −1 in Plain et al ( 2009) and Gavrichkova et al (2011), 0.15-0.62 m h −1 in Kuptz et al (2011), 0.22-1.21 m h −1 in Dannoura et al (2011). At the same time, the minimum velocity of 0.02 m h −1 is in the range as found for beech saplings under drought by Ruehr et al (2009).…”
Section: Carbon Allocation Velocitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Gavrichkova et al . () observed midday and night‐time 13 C‐enrichment in beech leaf sugars from the crown top at a Mountain‐Mediterranean site with high VPD. The absence of night‐time 13 C‐enrichment in our study might be related to the moderate climatic situation, as rainfall events can cause the cessation of the diel oscillation (Brandes et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies compared d 13 C in leaf and trunk phloem WSOM or sugars at breast height in forest trees (Gessler et al, 2009a;Gavrichkova et al, 2011;Offermann et al, 2011). However, a more detailed sampling pattern of higher resolution in the canopy, including the twigs directly adjacent to the sampled leaves, and along the stem is needed to clarify the influence of assimilate export, long-distance transport and canopy mixing on d 13 C WSOM in the trunk phloem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causal relationship between above- and belowground physiological processes – often termed aboveground to belowground coupling – has been shown by girdling and stable isotope tracer studies (Högberg et al, 2001; Kuzyakov and Gavrichkova, 2010). For beech trees, transport velocities of up to 1 m h -1 have been reported (Plain et al, 2009; Gavrichkova et al, 2011; Kuptz et al, 2011), depending on seasonality (Kuptz et al, 2011), tree height (Kuzyakov and Gavrichkova, 2010), and environmental conditions like drought (Barthel et al, 2011). In a forest ecosystem, complexity is added to the straightforward link between assimilatory and respiratory CO 2 fluxes from the soil, e.g., due to different sources contributing to soil CO 2 fluxes (microbial vs. plant-related), different plant species and plant ages as well as changing environmental conditions on diurnal and seasonal scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%