2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-2133-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term NK1 receptor antagonism and emotional processing in healthy volunteers

Abstract: These results suggest that NK1 receptor antagonism does affect some aspects of emotional processing and, in particular, that it has anxiolytic-like effects. The profile of effects reported here is, however, more limited than that found in response to conventional antidepressant treatment, and this may explain disappointing results at clinical trial. Healthy volunteer models of emotional processing may be useful in closing the gap between preclinical and clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this, the effects of these drugs on emotional processing were more restricted than those typically seen with antidepressant drug treatment [87][88][89][90]. For example, the NK1 antagonist aprepitant increased ACC and amygdala activity to happy faces, but unlike other antidepressant studies had no effect on neural processing of fearful faces [87].…”
Section: Converging Evidence For the Neurocognitive Modelmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Consistent with this, the effects of these drugs on emotional processing were more restricted than those typically seen with antidepressant drug treatment [87][88][89][90]. For example, the NK1 antagonist aprepitant increased ACC and amygdala activity to happy faces, but unlike other antidepressant studies had no effect on neural processing of fearful faces [87].…”
Section: Converging Evidence For the Neurocognitive Modelmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The trend was seen in the absence of any effects on the two tests of non-emotional memory (n-back and AVLT) providing some evidence to suggest that it is not secondary to broader changes in memory function. Within the neuropsychological model of antidepressant drug action, emotional memory effects have usually been found in surprise free-recall tests as opposed to recognition tests, although effects on recognition memory have also been seen in some studies (Malcolm et al, 2009; Pringle et al, 2011b). However, this trend to an effect was in the absence of any other significant effects on emotional memory or categorisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion-potentiated startle task (electromyography). A detailed description is provided elsewhere (Pringle et al, 2011b). Concisely, after a habituation session, we presented 63 pictures of different valence (pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral), taken from the International Affective Picture Scale (gender specified; Larson et al, 2000), for 13 s followed by a picture with different valence, on a computer screen in three blocks in fixed order.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded the eye-blink component of startle reflexes using three lead electromyography (EMG startle response system, San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA). Acoustic probes were 50 ms, 95 dB bursts of white noise, delivered binaurally through headphones at 1.5, 4.5, or 7.5 s following picture onset (Pringle et al, 2011b). We calculated eye-blink reflex magnitudes and z-transformed those to normalize data and reduce intersubject variability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%