2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- to mid-term results of ulna head replacement as both a primary and revision implant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 As encouraging as these results are, only a minority of the patients in these reviews had preexisting wrist fusions. Many DRUJ arthroplasty studies have included a small number of patients with concomitant wrist fusion, [28][29][30][31][32] but no sub-analysis of this group of patients has been provided in these studies. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Von Groningen and Schuurman reported on six patients with a mean follow-up of 24 months with radioscapholunate fusion with ulnar head replacement after wrist arthritis due to distal radius fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 As encouraging as these results are, only a minority of the patients in these reviews had preexisting wrist fusions. Many DRUJ arthroplasty studies have included a small number of patients with concomitant wrist fusion, [28][29][30][31][32] but no sub-analysis of this group of patients has been provided in these studies. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Von Groningen and Schuurman reported on six patients with a mean follow-up of 24 months with radioscapholunate fusion with ulnar head replacement after wrist arthritis due to distal radius fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periprosthetic bone resorption and radiological instability after ulna head replacements have been described in the literature. 3 5 6 8 9 To further explore these phenomena, we compared two different prosthetic concepts: the total and partial ulna head replacements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 The clinical reports are few and the outcome of the various implants are mostly based on small, retrospective case series. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Most series report improved function, effective pain relief and preserved forearm rotation in most patients, and an implant survival of 90 to 100% 5 years postoperatively. 1 9 Radiographic phenomena, such as periprosthetic bone resorption and implant subluxation are frequently being described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports have shown favorable outcomes with these procedures; however, they fail to restore normal joint kinetics and stability. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Ulnar head hemiarthroplasty, with preservation of the foveal insertion, has offered the possibility of pain relief and improved forearm kinematics in patients with DRUJ arthritis. Partial ulnar head hemiarthroplasty within the United States is limited to metal implants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports have shown favorable outcomes with these procedures; however, they fail to restore normal joint kinetics and stability. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%