2000
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7232.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should doctors get CME points for reading?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other traits of value for a health professional, reading scientific literature must be associated with faculty repetition, reinforcement, and role modelling. If pre‐doctoral students are in the habit of reading peer‐reviewed literature relevant to patient care while they are receiving their professional training, it is likely that they will continue the practice after graduation (39, 40).…”
Section: Five Directions To Considermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other traits of value for a health professional, reading scientific literature must be associated with faculty repetition, reinforcement, and role modelling. If pre‐doctoral students are in the habit of reading peer‐reviewed literature relevant to patient care while they are receiving their professional training, it is likely that they will continue the practice after graduation (39, 40).…”
Section: Five Directions To Considermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Practicing medicine without reading is unthinkable and reading of contemporaneous journals and relevant research articles is extensively used in searching for information to solve clinical problems” [84]. “Journal reading is well established as an important source of continuing medical education of physicians, at least at the level of knowledge development” [85].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity, where students read an article by themselves and answer questions in a very limited time frame, may prepare them for their role as physicians . Students appreciated the time‐limited nature of the e‐journal exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%