2017
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should I stay or should I go? Hospital emergency department waiting times and demand

Abstract: In the absence of the price mechanism, hospital emergency departments rely on waiting times, alongside prioritisation mechanisms, to restrain demand and clear the market. This paper estimates by how much the number of treatments demanded is reduced by a higher waiting time. I use variation in waiting times for low-urgency patients caused by rare and resource-intensive high-urgency patients to estimate the relationship. I find that when waiting times are higher, more low-urgency patients are deterred from treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is somewhat inconsistent with Sivey (2018) who finds demand-induced increases in ED waiting times cause larger reductions in the number of patients treated in weekend periods. However, differences in magnitudes between weekday and weekend periods identified in Sivey (2018) were small, and, consistent with our findings, the largest effects were found in an out-of-hours period (6 p.m.-midnight).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is somewhat inconsistent with Sivey (2018) who finds demand-induced increases in ED waiting times cause larger reductions in the number of patients treated in weekend periods. However, differences in magnitudes between weekday and weekend periods identified in Sivey (2018) were small, and, consistent with our findings, the largest effects were found in an out-of-hours period (6 p.m.-midnight).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5 The first measure, 'long overall waits', is the number of attendances to the ED in a week that last more than 4 h, from arrival to the patient being dealt with. Here, 'dealt with' covers discharge alive or dead, inpatient admission or transfer elsewhere [19]. The second measure comprises the number of ED attendances lasting more than 4 h after a decision has been made to admit the patient as an inpatient.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When more attendances end without treatment, long waits are more frequent. This might reflect a range of scenarios including patients leaving untreated if their expected waiting time is long [19]. EDs also act as a safety net for people suffering a mental health crisis: poor access to specialist mental health services can cause delays [33], and these individuals are more likely to leave EDs without being seen [34].…”
Section: Overall Waits > 4 H (Ed) Trolley Waits > 4 H (Ed) Overall Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hospital emergency departments, the absence of a formal price mechanism to equate the demand for treatment with the available supply means that waiting times act as a rationing device [ 1 ]. The prioritisation of patients is typically based on the severity of symptoms and the urgency of care required, and patients experience waiting times in a ‘queue’ where they must be physically present at the emergency department to receive treatment [ 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%