Debates in the Digital Humanities 2012
DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Liberal Arts Campuses Do Digital Humanities? Process and Products in the Small College World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars in the digital humanities field indicate a need for more collaboration between technology and humanities in academia (Zilberg, ), in addition to increasing the awareness of what both fields could contribute to each other (Ioannides, Arnold, Niccolucci, & Mania, ; Keener, ; Marden, Li‐Madeo, Whysel, & Edelstein, ; Ott & Pozzi, ; Silberman, ). The onus of creating awareness lies on policy makers as well as academics through public engagement and outreach activities (Alexander & Davis, ; Higgins, ; Hirsch, ; Zorich, ). Additionally, outreach activities conducted by cultural heritage management boards and technology partners increased both public and practitioner awareness of how the fields contributed to each other (Dalbello, ; Dorner, ; Liu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars in the digital humanities field indicate a need for more collaboration between technology and humanities in academia (Zilberg, ), in addition to increasing the awareness of what both fields could contribute to each other (Ioannides, Arnold, Niccolucci, & Mania, ; Keener, ; Marden, Li‐Madeo, Whysel, & Edelstein, ; Ott & Pozzi, ; Silberman, ). The onus of creating awareness lies on policy makers as well as academics through public engagement and outreach activities (Alexander & Davis, ; Higgins, ; Hirsch, ; Zorich, ). Additionally, outreach activities conducted by cultural heritage management boards and technology partners increased both public and practitioner awareness of how the fields contributed to each other (Dalbello, ; Dorner, ; Liu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a practice-based module, LOA and constructive alignment provide frameworks for using project work to assess whether students are gaining key skills, and whether they understand why these skills are considered key in the field of DH work and research. This is particularly important given the emergence of research and thought on the future of DH curriculum (see for example Klein, 2011;Alexander & Davis, 2012;Clement et al 2013 andPun, 2015). Inquiries into pedagogy for DH is arguably distinct from inquiries into the scope and purpose of DH but, case studies like this one in some ways offer the best of both worlds -a discussion on how to use theory to help students form their own insights and ideas gained through project work.…”
Section: Academic Context: Methods and Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies of DH curricula have surveyed programs (Sula et al, 2017), course syllabi (Spiro, 2011; Terras, 2006), instructors (Croxall & Jakacki, 2019), and practitioners (Clement & Carter, 2017), and numerous articles have discussed the development of DH programs and courses in specific locations, such as community colleges (McGrail, 2016), colleges of liberal arts and science (Alexander & Davis, 2012; Buurma & Levine, 2016), graduate education (Selisker, 2016), and libraries (Rosenblum et al, 2016; Varner, 2016; Vedantham & Porter, 2016). While several of these have addressed how librarians learn and then teach DH, none has systematically examined DH courses within iSchools as a whole, despite these being responsible for training information professionals for work in libraries, archives, museums, and other environments that have been identified as key sites of DH work and partners for collaboration.…”
Section: Courses and Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%