2009
DOI: 10.1097/cco.0b013e32832c9651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should the indications for the use of myeloid growth factors for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients be extended?

Abstract: It is likely that the consideration of these newly recognized risk factors and the availability of more affordable granulocyte colony-stimulating factors will lead, in the near future, to an extension of the presently recognized indications for the prescription of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human guidelines do not routinely recommend adjunctive administration of G‐CSF in febrile neutropenic patients, save for those patients deemed at high risk for complications or poor clinical outcome based on predictive models, as treatment with G‐CSF post‐admission has not consistently shown benefit in hospitalized patients with FN . Haematopoietic growth factors have a well‐defined prophylactic role in the human arena, however, and are currently recommended in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy if the risk of developing FN is deemed equal to or greater than 20%, due to significant reduction in the incidence of chemotherapy‐induced FN, the severity and duration of neutropenia and infection‐related mortality in patients with both solid and haematological malignancies . In veterinary medicine, the administration of myeloid growth factors has hitherto been limited due to issues of cost, availability and concern regarding side effects, as well as a relative lack of prospective evidence informing their ideal usage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human guidelines do not routinely recommend adjunctive administration of G‐CSF in febrile neutropenic patients, save for those patients deemed at high risk for complications or poor clinical outcome based on predictive models, as treatment with G‐CSF post‐admission has not consistently shown benefit in hospitalized patients with FN . Haematopoietic growth factors have a well‐defined prophylactic role in the human arena, however, and are currently recommended in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy if the risk of developing FN is deemed equal to or greater than 20%, due to significant reduction in the incidence of chemotherapy‐induced FN, the severity and duration of neutropenia and infection‐related mortality in patients with both solid and haematological malignancies . In veterinary medicine, the administration of myeloid growth factors has hitherto been limited due to issues of cost, availability and concern regarding side effects, as well as a relative lack of prospective evidence informing their ideal usage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, international guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis when there is an increased risk of febrile neutropenia of greater than or equal to 20%, although the broader use of prophylactic CSF has been suggested 118,124 . How extensively a non-toxic agent is used is based in part on economic criteria and, when the costs of CSFs are reduced with the introduction of generic CSFs, the occasions on which CSFs may usefully be employed should increase.…”
Section: Clinical Trials Of Csfs and Therapeutic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declines in WBC subsets can result in delays in chemotherapy and reductions in dosage (Khan et al 2008) and increased risk of infection, mortality and hospital admissions (Klastersky et al 2009). Similarly, declines in RBC indices can exacerbate fatigue, reduce quality of life, result in delays in treatment, and have a negative impact on survival (Hauser et al 2006; Pirker et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%