2017
DOI: 10.1177/1477878517701748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should the public pay for higher education? Equality, liberty, and educational debt

Abstract: As governments shift costs from the public to students, a higher education has become synonymous with educational debt. Liberal egalitarians have justified educational debt on the grounds that it facilitates socioeconomic equality. On this view, the public should only fund access for those students who are so poorly off that educational debt would be too risky. In this article, I offer a ‘fair play’ analysis of higher education funding in order to show that socioeconomic equality is a necessary, but insufficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different studies have indicated that the benefits of investment in university education accrue to the individual student (Martin, 2017). However, overall, the benefits, which may be economical, social, or educational, are largely non-quantifiable, implying that we risk making judgments based on incomplete information.…”
Section: The Benefits Of University Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have indicated that the benefits of investment in university education accrue to the individual student (Martin, 2017). However, overall, the benefits, which may be economical, social, or educational, are largely non-quantifiable, implying that we risk making judgments based on incomplete information.…”
Section: The Benefits Of University Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a reconstruction of justice-based accounts of higher education funding, for example, seeMartin, 2017. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%