2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13116172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should We Expect a Disastrous Fire Accident in an Urban Road Tunnel? Literature Data Review and a Case Study for Selected Tunnels in Poland

Abstract: Urban road tunnels are a reasonable remedy for inconvenience due to congested road traffic. However, they bring specific threats, especially those related to the possibility of fire outbreak. This work is a case study for selected urban road tunnels. Considering tunnel specificity, road traffic intensity, and structure and based on the literature data for vehicle fire probability, the chances of a fire accident were estimated for selected tunnels in Poland. It was shown that low power tunnel fires could be exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to X(Fi) ∩ Y(Fi) = X(Fi), such as S1 corresponding line X(Fi) = {1,2,8,9,10,24,28}, Corresponding columns Y(Fi) = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,37,38,39,40}, X(Fi) ∩ Y(Fi) = {1,2,8,9,10,24,28} = X(Fi), thus inferring from S1 to S40.The first condition to be satisfied is I = 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 24, 28 which means that S1, S2, S8, S9, S10, S24, S28 is the topmost layer of the system, but also the most superficial causative factor of the tunnel fire accident, and then the elements about 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 24, 28 are removed, and I = 3,4,5,6,25,26,27 meets the requirements, which means that S3, S4, S5, S6, S25, S26, S27 are the reasons for the second layer of the system. And so on to determine the hierarchy of risk factors.…”
Section: Determine the Hierarchy Of Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to X(Fi) ∩ Y(Fi) = X(Fi), such as S1 corresponding line X(Fi) = {1,2,8,9,10,24,28}, Corresponding columns Y(Fi) = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,37,38,39,40}, X(Fi) ∩ Y(Fi) = {1,2,8,9,10,24,28} = X(Fi), thus inferring from S1 to S40.The first condition to be satisfied is I = 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 24, 28 which means that S1, S2, S8, S9, S10, S24, S28 is the topmost layer of the system, but also the most superficial causative factor of the tunnel fire accident, and then the elements about 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 24, 28 are removed, and I = 3,4,5,6,25,26,27 meets the requirements, which means that S3, S4, S5, S6, S25, S26, S27 are the reasons for the second layer of the system. And so on to determine the hierarchy of risk factors.…”
Section: Determine the Hierarchy Of Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 2 parameters in the N-K model: N represents the number of nodes that make up the system, and if there are N nodes in the system, and there are n branches in each node, there are a total of nN kinds of possible combinations [25,26]. K represents the number of coupling factors related to each other in the system, with the maximum value of K being N-1 and the minimum value of 0.…”
Section: Improved Multi-factor Coupled Calculation Of N-k Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this article does not cover fire safety and primary safety. The fire safety is explored in publications [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%