2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2020.2985395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Show, Match and Segment: Joint Weakly Supervised Learning of Semantic Matching and Object Co-Segmentation

Abstract: We present an approach for jointly matching and segmenting object instances of the same category within a collection of images. In contrast to existing algorithms that tackle the tasks of semantic matching and object co-segmentation in isolation, our method exploits the complementary nature of the two tasks. The key insights of our method are two-fold. First, the estimated dense correspondence field from semantic matching provides supervision for object co-segmentation by enforcing consistency between the pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further understand the image co-segmentation frameworks, we compared the co-segmentation performance of nine techniques: geometric mean saliency based cosegmentation (GMS) [121], group saliency propagation based co-segmentation (GSP) [122], saliency co-fusion based co-segmentation (SCF) [76], co-segmentation and cosketch (CSST) [89], co-segmentation and co-skeletonization (CSSL) [90], joint object discovery and segmentation (JODS) [21], decomposition multiple foreground co-segmentation (DMFC) [18], joint semantic matching and co-segmentation (JSMC) [100] and multiple random walkers based cosegmentation (MRW) [47] on iCoseg dataset, MSRC dataset, Internet dataset and Coseg-Rep dataset, respectively. The experimental results are produced by directly running the implementation codes from their websites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further understand the image co-segmentation frameworks, we compared the co-segmentation performance of nine techniques: geometric mean saliency based cosegmentation (GMS) [121], group saliency propagation based co-segmentation (GSP) [122], saliency co-fusion based co-segmentation (SCF) [76], co-segmentation and cosketch (CSST) [89], co-segmentation and co-skeletonization (CSSL) [90], joint object discovery and segmentation (JODS) [21], decomposition multiple foreground co-segmentation (DMFC) [18], joint semantic matching and co-segmentation (JSMC) [100] and multiple random walkers based cosegmentation (MRW) [47] on iCoseg dataset, MSRC dataset, Internet dataset and Coseg-Rep dataset, respectively. The experimental results are produced by directly running the implementation codes from their websites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neighborhood consensus module [61] is used to obtain correlations of the two given features f a and f b , because it has already been applied and achieved superior performance in previous research [59]. COSNet [62] proposed another method which uses an affinity matrix to denote co-attention, and so to mine the correlations through adding a weight matrix and verifying the proposed three matrix styles by experiments. In the paper, the co-attention style is exploited to obtain the correlation map like COSNet, which is showed in Figure 4 with the blue dashed box.…”
Section: Co-attention Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by RANSAC, Rocco et al [14] further introduced an end-to-end trainable and weakly supervised CNN architecture using soft inlier counts. Their work was further improved by introducing joint learning with co-segmentation [15] and applying methods for predicting the foreground region and enforcing cycle consistency [18]. Kim et al [19] designed a network with a recurrent structure to estimate geometric transformation iteratively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%