2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecmr.2015.7324049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Show me your moves! Conveying navigation intention of a mobile robot to humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Szafir et al [47] implemeted light-emitting diode (LED) based indicators in a quadcopter to test four different designs for intent communication. May et al [28] utilized 'implicit joint attention using gaze' and 'turn indicators' by adopting the semantics of a car's turning indicators. Watanabe et al [48] implemented a light projection system in an autonomous wheelchair that shows the future trajectory.…”
Section: Inducement For Conveying Intent In Robot Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Szafir et al [47] implemeted light-emitting diode (LED) based indicators in a quadcopter to test four different designs for intent communication. May et al [28] utilized 'implicit joint attention using gaze' and 'turn indicators' by adopting the semantics of a car's turning indicators. Watanabe et al [48] implemented a light projection system in an autonomous wheelchair that shows the future trajectory.…”
Section: Inducement For Conveying Intent In Robot Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, the robot needs the ability to cooperate with humans. Considering that humans may not always notice the robot, it need to be able to convey its motion-intention via some methods, such as pointing to a path, making sounds, and interacting physically [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to AVs, it is crucial that mobile robots can co-exist and move safely among humans (Goodrich and Schultz, 2007). As highlighted by May et al (2015), due to humans’ special needs to feel safe and comfortable when interacting with such robots, it is often not sufficient that robots treat humans merely as dynamic objects and try avoiding them. Instead, robots and humans need to have a mutual understanding of the situation and each other’s intentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, May et al (2015) investigated effects of showing navigational intent of a mobile robot to humans by means of (a) gaze and (b) a turn indicator. They found that both approaches had a significant effect; however, the approach (b) was more effective in communicating the intent and resulted in a higher perceived comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a learning task the participants tended to detect quicker that an error would occur and addressed it when the robot used gaze cues to signal that it had finished its turn and was ready to engage in the next step of the task [19]. Besides collaborative performance, the use of non-verbal cues like gazes, facial expressions, lights or legible motions make the robot's internal states clearer for its human partner [20,21] and can serve to communicate its knowledge about the task execution state [22,23]. For instance, the use of lights as indicators to communicate navigational intention has been shown to improve human understanding [23].…”
Section: Robotic Communication For Joint Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%