1996
DOI: 10.1116/1.580200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Si/XeF2 etching: Reaction layer dynamics and surface roughening

Abstract: The etching of Si(100) is studied quantitatively in a molecular beam setup. After exposing the silicon surface to XeF2 doses between 102 and 104 monolayers (MLs) of XeF2, thermal desorption spectroscopy is used to study the SiFx content of the reaction layer. Large values of the fluorine content (up to 30 ML) are observed. These are explained by surface roughening due to the etching process, which increases the effective surface by up to a factor of 6 after 105 ML of XeF2, corresponding to 104 ML of etched Si.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24) plasmas, and also in XeF 2 gases with 18 and without 12 Ar þ ion beams. Correspondingly, several theoretical and/or numerical studies have been made to interpret the roughness experimentally observed in plasma etching, using a continuum model, [13][14][15][16] Monte Carlo simulation, 15,16,22,23,28,29,31 and classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…24) plasmas, and also in XeF 2 gases with 18 and without 12 Ar þ ion beams. Correspondingly, several theoretical and/or numerical studies have been made to interpret the roughness experimentally observed in plasma etching, using a continuum model, [13][14][15][16] Monte Carlo simulation, 15,16,22,23,28,29,31 and classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In previous studies by our group, 17,18,20 it was found that for spontaneous etching the ratio of these signals is independent of etching parameters like the XeF 2 flux or the sample temperature. Therefore it was concluded that both signals originate from the XeF 2 molecule and that there is no XeF desorption or fractional usage of XeF 2 .…”
Section: Reaction Of Xefmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We attribute both effects to the reduction in surface roughness by ion bombardment. 20 Such differences in specific surface conditions could also very well be the cause of the scatter of the data points: these fluctuations disappear when we plot the difference between the spontaneous and the ion-assisted reaction coefficients, as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 2.…”
Section: Reaction Of Xefmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After monolayer saturation F 2 ceases to react with the surface, whereas XeF 2 continues to deposit fluorine by reacting with the Si−Si dimer and lattice bonds. The dose dependence of the fluorine content was shown to not follow a single exponential behavior, but to rather increase rapidly in the early stages of the uptake but much more slowly thereafter [454]. This behavior was explained by the rapid development of a monolayer of SiF x surface species in the initial regime followed by the slow formation of a steady-state multilayer of SiF-SiF 2 -SiF 3 and SiF 2 -SiF 3 chains.…”
Section: Ai Silicon Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 91%