2008
DOI: 10.1086/588761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sibship Size and Educational Achievement: The Role of Welfare Regimes Cross‐Nationally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, it has been shown that particular institutions or external agencies, such as the Catholic Church (Blake 1989), the Mormon community (Downey and Neubauer 1998), certain welfare regimes (Xu 2008), or national public policies (Park 2008) stimulate large families and provide incentives that offset the negative effects of large sibships. Pro-family and pronatalist norms, and financial support for large families (e.g.…”
Section: Buffering: Extended Kin Groups and Social Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it has been shown that particular institutions or external agencies, such as the Catholic Church (Blake 1989), the Mormon community (Downey and Neubauer 1998), certain welfare regimes (Xu 2008), or national public policies (Park 2008) stimulate large families and provide incentives that offset the negative effects of large sibships. Pro-family and pronatalist norms, and financial support for large families (e.g.…”
Section: Buffering: Extended Kin Groups and Social Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consequence of these policies could be that within-family influences would be small in Norway compared to countries governed by other principles of education policies. Ecologic relations between population family size distribution, regime according to Esping-Andersen's typology, and educational attainment have been analyzed in a study using data from the Program for International Student Assessment across 24 Western industrialized countries (Xu, 2008). The results suggest that family size has less influence on educational attainment in social democratic regimes such as Norway (Xu, 2008).…”
Section: Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologic relations between population family size distribution, regime according to Esping-Andersen's typology, and educational attainment have been analyzed in a study using data from the Program for International Student Assessment across 24 Western industrialized countries (Xu, 2008). The results suggest that family size has less influence on educational attainment in social democratic regimes such as Norway (Xu, 2008). Nonetheless, intergenerational data suggest that educational attainment in Norway is highly dependent on family background (Aakvik et al, 2005;Lindbekk, 1998).…”
Section: Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several educational reforms intending to increase the education level as well as increase the equality of opportunity have been implemented during the last decades in Norway (Aakvik et al, 2005). Policy differences between European countries have been found, classifying regimes according to Esping-Andersen's model as liberal, conservative or socialdemocratic (Hega & Hokenmaier, 2002;Xu, 2008). Liberal regimes, e.g.…”
Section: Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%