1999
DOI: 10.1021/bi9913449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side Chain Mobility and Ligand Interactions of the G Strand of Tear Lipocalins by Site-Directed Spin Labeling

Abstract: Side chain mobility, accessibility, and backbone motion were studied by site-directed spin labeling of sequential cysteine mutants of the G strand in tear lipocalins (TL). A nitroxide scan between residues 98 and 105 revealed the alternating periodicity of mobility and accessibility to NiEDDA and oxygen, characteristic of a beta-strand. Residue 99 was the most inaccessible to NiEDDA and oxygen. EPR spectra with the fast relaxing agent, K(3)Fe(CN)(6), exhibited two nitroxide populations for most residues. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spectra are very similar to that of holo-forms that have been studied previously [27]. For some sites, two dynamic modes, indicated as α and β in Figure 1, can be easily observed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These spectra are very similar to that of holo-forms that have been studied previously [27]. For some sites, two dynamic modes, indicated as α and β in Figure 1, can be easily observed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…All single Cys mutant and wild-type proteins used in this study have been characterized previously [27]. For G-strand residues of TL, the effects of mutations on secondary structure and binding characteristics are minimal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Laser light scattering studies have confirmed that the recombinant protein is monomeric similar to the native protein [25]. Previously, cysteine labeling studies of the recombinant protein have confirmed that the thiol group on C101 was available for labeling, excluding the possibility of disulfide scrambling [26]. The labeling efficiency of the recombinant protein never exceeded a ratio of 1:1.…”
Section: Expression and Purification Of Recombinant Tear Lipocalinmentioning
confidence: 96%