2007
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600935612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side‐scan sonographs of steep slopes in the Wushieh Reservoir

Abstract: Operators tow side-scan sonar transducers at the optimum height from the bottom to produce better quality side-scan sonographs. This can be done only if the bottom is moderately flat. Sonographs with maximum tonal intensity are easily produced on steep slopes e.g. valley banks. Strong signatures are recorded over all ranges due to the poor geometry of sonographs produced without acoustic shadows. In order to create clear scanned images of a steep slope using a side-scan sonar, rotation of the towed fish or til… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of high-resolution seafloor bathymetry data, previous characterizations of entire pockmark fields relied upon visual interpretation of acoustic backscatter data for pockmark delineation, size statistics and spatial distribution (Fader, 1991;Kelley et al, 1994;Gontz et al, 2002;Rogers et al, 2006). Although acoustic backscatter data were the best available in the cited studies, interpreting size dimensions of concave features, such as pockmarks from these data is often ambiguous (Song, 2007). High-resolution bathymetry data collected by multibeam echosounder and swath sonar technologies enable the study of seafloor morphology to reach scales and resolutions similar to studies in subaerial geomorphology based on digital elevation models (DEMs) (Hughes Clarke et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of high-resolution seafloor bathymetry data, previous characterizations of entire pockmark fields relied upon visual interpretation of acoustic backscatter data for pockmark delineation, size statistics and spatial distribution (Fader, 1991;Kelley et al, 1994;Gontz et al, 2002;Rogers et al, 2006). Although acoustic backscatter data were the best available in the cited studies, interpreting size dimensions of concave features, such as pockmarks from these data is often ambiguous (Song, 2007). High-resolution bathymetry data collected by multibeam echosounder and swath sonar technologies enable the study of seafloor morphology to reach scales and resolutions similar to studies in subaerial geomorphology based on digital elevation models (DEMs) (Hughes Clarke et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%