Sight Word and Phonics Training in Children With Dyslexia

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (a) compare sight word training and phonics training in children with dyslexia, and (b) determine if different orders of sight word and phonics training have different effects on the reading skills of children with dyslexia. One group of children (n = 36) did 8 weeks of phonics training (reading via grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules) and then 8 weeks of sight word training (reading irregular words as a whole), one group did the reverse (n = 36), and one group did phonics and sight word training simultaneously for two 8-week periods (n = 32). We measured the effects of phonics and sight word training on sight word reading (trained irregular word reading accuracy, untrained irregular word reading accuracy), phonics reading (nonword reading accuracy, nonword reading fluency), and general reading (word reading fluency, reading comprehension). Sight word training led to significant gains in sight word reading measures that were larger than gains made from phonics training, phonics training led to statistically significant gains in a phonics reading measure that were larger than gains made from sight word training, and both types of training led to significant gains in general reading that were similar in size. Training phonics before sight words had a slight advantage over the reverse order. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings for improving the treatment and assessment of children with dyslexia.

Orthographic learning in developmental surface and phonological dyslexia

“…Letter analysis skill was examined using a crosscase matching task (McArthur et al, 2013). In this task, there were 14 letters, half in upper case and half in lower case.…”

“…To assess word-specific orthographic knowledge in the orthographic lexicon, we used a lexical decision test with pseudohomophone distractors (McArthur et al, 2013). Thirty target words were selected from the Children's Printed Word Database (CPWD; Masterson, Stuart, Dixon, & Lovejoy, 2003).…”

Assessment of lexical and non-lexical spelling in students in Grades 1–7

“…However, test -retest data for both tests were available from the Macquarie University Reading Training study (McArthur et al, 2013a). This was a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of sight word and phonics training for children with dyslexia.…”

Helping children with reading difficulties: some things we have learned so far

“…According to the systematic review conducted by Galuschka et al 47 , current evidence suggests that this intervention should focus on the proximal impairment of a child's reading behaviour, rather than a possible distal impairment. Two more recent controlled trials 52,53 and a systematic review 54 further suggest that it is possible to selectively train different proximal impairments of poor reading behaviours in order to improve those behaviours. The outcomes of these studies and reviews tentatively suggest that proximal interventions can be executed by a reading specialist or a highlysophisticated online reading training programme.…”