1992
DOI: 10.1364/ao.31.006076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign conventions in magneto-optical calculations and measurements

Abstract: A brief outline is given of the multiplicity of sign conventions appearing in the literature in association with theoretical and experimental topics concerning magneto-optics. It is shown that there are essentially two competing schemes available for the description of magneto-optical effects and that these are not, in all respects, entirely equivalent. A summary of these sign conventions is presented, and reasons are given for the adoption of a particular preferred scheme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to note that the sign convention e jwt is commonly used in the electronics field to represent the incident and reflected waves in (1), while e −jwt is sometimes adopted in the optics field [19,20]. Hence, the scattering matrix defined with one sign convention is the complex conjugate of the other.…”
Section: Conventional State-space Modeling Of Photonic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that the sign convention e jwt is commonly used in the electronics field to represent the incident and reflected waves in (1), while e −jwt is sometimes adopted in the optics field [19,20]. Hence, the scattering matrix defined with one sign convention is the complex conjugate of the other.…”
Section: Conventional State-space Modeling Of Photonic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was previously qualitatively noted by Zayets and Ando, 22 and with our derived Eq. (15), this can now also be quantified.…”
Section: ͑11͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to underline that the exp͑+jt − j␤z͒ convention (with ␤ the propagation constant of the guided mode), and the preferred sign scheme of Atkinson and Lissberger is used in all optical and MO characterization experiments 15 and in all theoretical simulations. This implies the following relative signs for the real and imaginary parts of the indices,…”
Section: B Building Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the optical and the polar complex Kerr data the magneto-optic parameter Q is determined directly making use of the 4 × 4 [7] matrix approach for calculating the magneto-optical effects and again taking into account finite film thicknesses, buffer layers and the optical properties of the substrate. The sign convention for the Kerr rotation measurements and the magneto-optic parameter is the preferred scheme described in detail elsewhere [8]. The physical data corresponding to the films and associated magnetic properties is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Optical and Magneto-optical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%