2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26401-1_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign Language Recognition Using Leap Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SVM's accuracy was affected by the order in which the sign motions were performed. This result was not validated statistically [42]. Deepali Naglot et al proposed technique for classification of American Sign Language.…”
Section: Sensor-basedmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The SVM's accuracy was affected by the order in which the sign motions were performed. This result was not validated statistically [42]. Deepali Naglot et al proposed technique for classification of American Sign Language.…”
Section: Sensor-basedmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…From manual gesture to speech, numerous studies using the LMC to recognize finger and hand movements to transcribe sign language into text or speech are listed by Galvá n-Ruiz et al [29]. The signer's training is a key factor in the sign recognition process and the order in which sign movements are performed affects accuracy [30] (American Sign Language). The LMC is also used for the recognition of other sign languages [31] (Arabic Sign Language), [32] (Chinese Sign Language), [33] (Indian Sign Language).…”
Section: The Lmc As An Assistive Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the leap motion controller connected to a PC, rather than a mobile phone, was used for alphabet sign language recognition. In [9] a recognition rate of 80% was reported for English alphabet, in [10] an accurate recognition of 100% was reported for the same alphabet. For the Indian and Chinese alphabet, recognition rates ranging from 90%-96% are reported in [11] and for the Arabic alphabet, a recognition rate of 99% was reported in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%