Abstract"Splitting" of circadian activity rhythms in Syrian hamsters maintained in constant light appears to be the consequence of a reorganized SCN, with left and right halves oscillating in antiphase; in split hamsters, high mRNA levels characteristic of day and night are simultaneously expressed on opposite sides of the paired SCN. To visualize the splitting phenomenon at a cellular level, immunohistochemical c-Fos protein expression in the SCN and brains of split hamsters was analyzed. One side of the split SCN exhibited relatively high c-Fos levels, in a pattern resembling that seen in normal, unsplit hamsters during subjective day in constant darkness; the opposite side was labeled only within a central-dorsolateral area of the caudal SCN, in a region that likely coincides with a photo-responsive, glutamate receptor antagonist-insensitive, pERK-expressing cluster of cells previously identified by other laboratories. Outside the SCN, visual inspection revealed an obvious left-right asymmetry of c-Fos expression in the medial preoptic nucleus and subparaventricular zone of split hamsters killed during the inactive phase and in the medial division of the lateral habenula during the active phase (when the hamsters were running in their wheels). Roles for the dorsolateral SCN and the mediolateral habenula in circadian timekeeping are not yet understood.
Keywordsc-Fos; calbindin; circadian; PER; splitting; suprachiasmatic nucleus Syrian hamsters maintained in constant illumination (LL) for a few months can exhibit a remarkable behavioral state, in which an animal's single daily bout of locomotor (wheelrunning) activity dissociates into 2 components that each free-run with different periods until they become stably coupled 180° apart. Pittendrigh and Daan (1976) were the first to systematically describe this phenomenon in hamsters and called it "splitting," citing it as evidence that the rodent circadian clock must be a complex pacemaker consisting of 2 mutually coupled oscillators. Further experimental analyses revealed that circadian rhythms of drinking (Shibuya et al., 1980), body temperature (Pickard et al., 1984), and luteinizing hormone secretion (Swann and Turek, 1985) could also split and that the 2 oscillators underlying the split state appeared to be functionally equivalent (Lees et al., 1983;Boulos and Morin, 1985;Meijer et al., 1988;Meijer et al., 1990). Pickard and Turek (1982) suggested that the split oscillators might correspond to the left and right sides of the bilaterally paired SCN, based on their observation that unilateral SCN lesions in split hamsters abolished behavioral splitting and produced a single bout of locomotion. Interpretation of their findings, however, was confounded by nonspecific surgical effects (Harrington et al., 1990).Recently, de la Iglesia et al. (2000) were able to assay SCN activity in unlesioned, split hamsters by measuring the expression of the "clock" genes Per and Bmal1 by in situ hybridization using cut tissue sections and film autoradiography. They found that hig...