[1990] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: 20th International Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/ftcs.1990.89374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signature analysers based on additive cellular automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next shown are the T + XI and the characteristic polynomial. Hence for an n-cell CA (synthesised using procedure 1) In section IV it has already been noted that for any class 1 CA, From the above two equations,…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Next shown are the T + XI and the characteristic polynomial. Hence for an n-cell CA (synthesised using procedure 1) In section IV it has already been noted that for any class 1 CA, From the above two equations,…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A good number of works have been reported in literature that deal with CAs based encryption, cryptography and authentication techniques; see for example Nandi et al (1994); Bao (2004); Seredynski et al (2004); Seredynski and Bouvry (2005); Chowdhury (2011, 2013); Formenti et al (2014). Other notable works, related to electronic circuit design are non-uniform ECAs based error correcting codes by Chowdhury et al (1994); , signature analysis by Hortensius et al (1990); Das et al (1990b), etc. For more discussion, see Chaudhuri et al (1997).…”
Section: Security and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliasing in single input linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) and MISRs have been studied by several researchers [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] under various bit error models to compute Pal" In this work we use the q-ary error model which considers correlated errors among Circuit Under Test (CUT) outputs 10,15,16]. The q-ary error model assumes that all (2m-l) error patterns possible at the m-output CUT are equally likely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%