of efforts have been invested to develop the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 -based devices such as rectifying junctions, [9] photodetector, [10] single-electron transistor, [11] and fieldeffect transistors. [12,13] Despite the versatile functionality of the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 HS, its practical application is still largely impeded because of its low room-temperature electron mobility (6-10 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ). [14,15] Hence, it is essential to improve the room-temperature 2DEG mobility of the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 HS for further practical applications. Meanwhile, other SrTiO 3based HS have also been explored to find high electron mobility oxide materials. Notable systems are γ-Al 2 O 3 /SrTiO 3 and CaZrO 3 /SrTiO 3 , [16,17] the electron mobilities of which are much higher than that in the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 HS.In principle, the electron mobility can be improved either by increasing scattering time (also called relaxation time) or by reducing electron effective mass. Accordingly, there are several mainstream approaches proposed to improve the electron mobility in the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 HS system. One strategy is to tune the epitaxial strain at the interface including several top layers in the substrate or in the films, which can affect the structural distortion and strain at the interfacial region and thus manipulate electronic properties. It has been experimentally and theoretically proven that controlling the epitaxial strain is one effective way to tune the interfacial charge carrier density. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Actually, a small lattice mismatch between the film and the substrate is expected to improve the crystalline quality of the heterointerface, thus increases the scattering time and accordingly electron mobility, which is extremely difficult to accurately quantify from first-principles calculations, though. For example, very recently, Ariando and co-workers have reported that by replacing LaAlO 3 with cubic (La 0.3 Sr 0.7 ) (Al 0.65 Ta 0.35 )O 3 (LSAT), the lattice mismatch between the film and the SrTiO 3 substrate is reduced from 3.0% to 1.0%, and interfacial electron mobility can be significantly improved (about 35 000 cm 2 V −1 s −1 at 2 K), which is almost 30 times larger than that in the conventional LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 . [24] One the other hand, Gunkel et al. [25] proposed that the reduced epitaxial strain in LSAT/SrTiO 3 has only minor effects on the improved mobility. They attributed the increased electron mobility to the suppression of the defects at the interface, which corresponds The 2D electron gas (2DEG) formed at the interface between two insulating perovskite oxides such as LaAlO 3 and SrTiO 3 provides a playground for developing all-oxide electronic devices, though improving the 2DEG mobility is still a great challenge. One possible way of improving the 2DEG mobility is via δ-doping at the heterointerface. As a proof of concept, one recent experiment achieves an ultra-high 2DEG mobility of 73 000 cm 2 V −1 s −1 at the LaAlO 3 / SrTiO 3 heterointerface via Mn δ-doping. Here the electronic and energetic properties ...