2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01505-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of strong magnetization and a metal-poor atmosphere for a Neptune-sized exoplanet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have been no direct measurements of exoplanet magnetic field strength yet, several indirect methods can offer constraints for particular planets. Recently, Ben-Jaffel et al (2021) detected the magnetosphere of the warm Neptune HAT-P-11b and estimated the equatorial magnetic field strength to be between 1 and 5 G. Magnetic planet star interactions, specifically Calcium II K emission, have also been used to indirectly estimate the surface magnetic fields of HJs in the range of 10-100 G (Cauley et al 2019). Variability in hotspot location has been found in 3D nonideal MHD models, leading Rogers (2017) to estimate a minimum magnetic field strength of 6 Gauss for the UHJ HAP-P-7b, in order to explain the observed variability on that planet (it should be noted, however, that recent work from Lally & Vanderburg 2022 finds that the observed variation could be due to nonatmospheric sources).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been no direct measurements of exoplanet magnetic field strength yet, several indirect methods can offer constraints for particular planets. Recently, Ben-Jaffel et al (2021) detected the magnetosphere of the warm Neptune HAT-P-11b and estimated the equatorial magnetic field strength to be between 1 and 5 G. Magnetic planet star interactions, specifically Calcium II K emission, have also been used to indirectly estimate the surface magnetic fields of HJs in the range of 10-100 G (Cauley et al 2019). Variability in hotspot location has been found in 3D nonideal MHD models, leading Rogers (2017) to estimate a minimum magnetic field strength of 6 Gauss for the UHJ HAP-P-7b, in order to explain the observed variability on that planet (it should be noted, however, that recent work from Lally & Vanderburg 2022 finds that the observed variation could be due to nonatmospheric sources).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, atmospheric expansion and hydrodynamic escape, as well as thermospheric and ionospheric layers, temperatures, and winds, have all been measured or inferred for exoplanets using tracers such as He I and Na I, among others (see Vidal-Madjar et al 2011;Spake et al 2018;Seidel et al 2020;Cauley et al 2021;Allart et al 2019). Recently, observations of ionospheric species have been described as evidence for the possible first detection of an exoplanetary magnetic field (Ben-Jaffel et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, they are thought to be photoevaporated and eventually escape the planet. The mass-loss rates of atmospheric escape can be as high as 10 9 -10 13 g s −1 (Shaikhislamov et al 2020;Ben-Jaffel et al 2021;Czesla et al 2022). This process can have important ramifications for the planetary composition, evolution, and even the population of planets as a whole (Fulton et al 2017;Fulton & Petigura 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%