Gastric Cancer 1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-67368-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance and Location of Atrophic Gastritis and of Glandular Dysplasia in Benign and Malignant Gastric Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the original biopsy specimens and any subsequent pathological material were reviewed and reclassified as (1) no dysplasia, (2) low grade dysplasia, (3) high grade dysplasia, and (4) carcinoma. Gastric cancer was classified Little is known about the natural history of epithelial dysplasia in the stomach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the original biopsy specimens and any subsequent pathological material were reviewed and reclassified as (1) no dysplasia, (2) low grade dysplasia, (3) high grade dysplasia, and (4) carcinoma. Gastric cancer was classified Little is known about the natural history of epithelial dysplasia in the stomach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1993 which is smallest in patients with duodenal ulcers [16][17][18][19][20], In order to evaluate the prevalence oflM in underlyingHP gastritis, a total of 2,692 patients were investigated. To obtain more detailed information about the relative preva lence of IM, five different groups of patients with HP gas tritis were studied: with no lesions; with duodenal, pyloric or other gastric ulcers; or with chronic erosions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%