1994
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1994.12.5.1074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of a partial or slow response to front-line chemotherapy in the management of intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a literature review.

Abstract: Patients with aggressive NHL who experience a PR or who respond slowly to front-line chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Early introduction of dose-intensive salvage therapy before the development of progressive disease may benefit patients with a PR and requires testing in randomized clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Partial and NPPR rates were similar between the 2 arms, excluding slow responses as a cause for poorer prognosis. 60 The age for inclusion in this trial was chosen in order to maintain consistency with trials examining the role of high-dose chemotherapy in younger patients with poor prognostic features and because this was the discriminating value reported in the IPI study. The multivariate model based on tumor stage, serum LDH, and performance status was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups in this trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Partial and NPPR rates were similar between the 2 arms, excluding slow responses as a cause for poorer prognosis. 60 The age for inclusion in this trial was chosen in order to maintain consistency with trials examining the role of high-dose chemotherapy in younger patients with poor prognostic features and because this was the discriminating value reported in the IPI study. The multivariate model based on tumor stage, serum LDH, and performance status was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups in this trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid response to chemotherapy is a recognized surrogate marker of chemosensitivity in both HL and DLBCL with an attendant high likelihood of a longer PFS (86). Persistent FDG uptake after two to four cycles of chemotherapy is associated with relapse rates ranging from 50 to 100%, while the relapse rate in interim-PET-negative patients is usually lower than 10% (8792).…”
Section: Response Evaluation During Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] In 1983, the BerlinFrankfurt-Münster (BFM) study group started to evaluate the early treatment response to a prednisone pre-phase (prednisone response, PR) as a predictive factor for treatment outcome by measuring the peripheral blast count on Day 8 of treatment. 5 Since then, the PR has consistently been found to be one of the strongest independent prognostic factors for the prediction of treatment outcome in ALL-BFM studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%