2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the diagnosis of malignancies in patients with biliary stricture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, radiological findings and, in some cases, surgical interventions should be used in additiontoCA19-9assessmentforanaccuratediagnosis.AlthoughextremelyhighCA19-9levels,togetherwithclinical andradiologicalfindingsmayimplicateamalignancy,thisis notalwaystrue,aswehaveshowninourcase.PETwith[ 18 F] FDGhasbeensuccessfullyusedfordiagnosticevaluationof cholangiocarcinomas, and is associated with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 93% [10]. However, inflammatory processesmaycauseincreasedFDGuptakeincertaincases, causingfalse-positiveresults.Thus,FDG-PETimagingmust beinterpretedcarefully,especiallyinpatientswithsclerosing cholangitis, biliary stents, or other benign inflammatory conditionssuchascholecystitis [11,12].Andersonetal. [11] reported that in 1 of 7 patients with sclerosing cholangitis in their series, FDG-PET imaging was falsely interpreted as indicatingmalignantdisease.Klugeetal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, radiological findings and, in some cases, surgical interventions should be used in additiontoCA19-9assessmentforanaccuratediagnosis.AlthoughextremelyhighCA19-9levels,togetherwithclinical andradiologicalfindingsmayimplicateamalignancy,thisis notalwaystrue,aswehaveshowninourcase.PETwith[ 18 F] FDGhasbeensuccessfullyusedfordiagnosticevaluationof cholangiocarcinomas, and is associated with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 93% [10]. However, inflammatory processesmaycauseincreasedFDGuptakeincertaincases, causingfalse-positiveresults.Thus,FDG-PETimagingmust beinterpretedcarefully,especiallyinpatientswithsclerosing cholangitis, biliary stents, or other benign inflammatory conditionssuchascholecystitis [11,12].Andersonetal. [11] reported that in 1 of 7 patients with sclerosing cholangitis in their series, FDG-PET imaging was falsely interpreted as indicatingmalignantdisease.Klugeetal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET and PET/CT are proven to be useful in the diagnosis and staging of CC. In a recent study, PET showed sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 78% respectively [148] . In another study by Anderson et al [149] , PET had sensitivity of 85% for CC measuring at least 1 cm in size although its sensitivity was only 18% for infiltrating CC.…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomography (Pet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one series, PET led to a change of therapeutic management in 30% of patients suffering from cholangiocarcinoma because of detection of primary unsuspected metastases [26] . The limitation of FDG-PET is false positive results in patients with biliary tract infections, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and biliary stenting via endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and PTBD [26,31] . The diagnostic sensitivity can be increased by using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in combination with CT scanning (FDG-PET/CT).…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomography (Pet)mentioning
confidence: 99%