In recent years, the focus on feasibility studies for tunnels has increased in Norway. Traditionally, the refraction seismic method and the very low-frequency electromagnetic method (VLF-EM) have been used. The Geological Survey of Norway introduced the electrical resistivity traversing method (ERT) in feasibility studies for tunnel construction purposes. Resistivity modelling shows that the method has the potential to characterise fracture zones geometrically; i.e., the thickness, dip, and depth extent. Based on previous studies, a model for mineralogical characterisation is proposed. This model, and the possibility for geometrical characterisation, is critically tested with success on three tunnel projects. The results of the comparison study, with regards to weakness zones, show that VLF-EM is a method that is capable of locating fracture zones, while refraction seismic is capable of locating and indicating the width of the zone, and can be used to imply the thickness of the soil cover above bedrock. The 2D resistivity method is able to locate the weakness zone, indicate the width, depth extent, and the dip of the zone, and in addition, characterise the zone with respect to stability or water problems. The crystalline bedrock characterisation is divided into three groups: resistivity values above 3,000 X m indicating good rock quality, values between 3,000 and 500 X m indicating bedrock with mainly water problems, while values \500 X m indicate clay-bearing, unstable rock with fewer water problems. From our investigations, we conclude that the 2D resistivity method is a very good supplement to traditional methods for feasibility studies on tunnelling purposes in crystalline rock.