2005
DOI: 10.1245/aso.2005.03.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Histological Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Histological response to neoadjuvant CRT--as measured by residual tumor load--may be useful as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy. Characterization of the tumor cells that survive neoadjuvant CRT may help us to identify new or more appropriate targets for systemic therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
104
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several variables of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy have been proposed, including the number of severe degenerative cancer cells (SDCC), percentage of viable cells, degree of fibrosis or presence of necrosis (69,70). In a trial using SDCC to evaluate response to preoperative therapy, no advantage in terms of OS was observed in 13/26 patients who achieved a major response, defined as >80% SDCC (66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several variables of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy have been proposed, including the number of severe degenerative cancer cells (SDCC), percentage of viable cells, degree of fibrosis or presence of necrosis (69,70). In a trial using SDCC to evaluate response to preoperative therapy, no advantage in terms of OS was observed in 13/26 patients who achieved a major response, defined as >80% SDCC (66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, two trials correlated survival with the degree of fibrosis following neoadjuvant therapy, with conflicting results (71,72). However, when the presence of tumor necrosis and fibrosis were analyzed, only tumor necrosis was observed to be an adverse prognostic factor (70). The College of American Pathologists has proposed a grading system for tumor response subsequent to neoadjuvant therapy: 0) Complete response, no viable cells; i) moderate response, single or small groups of cells; ii) minimal response, residual cancer outgrown by fibrosis; and iii) poor response, extensive residual cancer (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative interpretation and one that we ascribe to is that neoadjuvant CRT identifies patients who are unlikely to achieve a survival benefit from surgery. Moreover, findings of complete pathologic response, a low incidence of metastatic lymph nodes, a low incidence of margin positivity and reduced local recurrences when compared with patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant treatment [11,12,13,14] are compelling arguments of the local impact of CRT [15,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,25,26,27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological response of tumors to neoadjuvant chemoradiation has been shown to be an important prognostic factor in which patients with complete pathologic response have improved overall survival [37,38]. However, the timing between completion of radiation and surgical resection remains unclear.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%