“…An alternative interpretation and one that we ascribe to is that neoadjuvant CRT identifies patients who are unlikely to achieve a survival benefit from surgery. Moreover, findings of complete pathologic response, a low incidence of metastatic lymph nodes, a low incidence of margin positivity and reduced local recurrences when compared with patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant treatment [11,12,13,14] are compelling arguments of the local impact of CRT [15,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,25,26,27]. …”