2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of multi-hazard risk in design of buildings under earthquake and wind loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While initial focus was on developing methods for achieving buildings systems with greater earthquake resistance (e.g., Moehle and Deierlein (2004)), the concepts of PBE have extended to other hazards, including wind, fire and tsunamis (e.g., Ciampoli et al (2011); Wang et al (2012); Attary et al (2017). Furthermore, the successful development of performance-based seismic engineering (PBSE) and its adoption in codes and practice over the past two decades has provided strong evidence for, not only the application of similar approaches for other natural and man-made hazards, but also riskconsistent multi-hazard design approaches (Gardoni and LaFave (2016); Suksuwan and Spence (2018); Kwag et al (2021). To successfully transfer this knowledge to wind engineering, the fundamental differences between seismic and wind effects for both structural and non-structural components, especially the envelope system, must be embraced while respecting the unique characteristics of wind loading and concurrent hazards (e.g., rainfall and debris impact).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While initial focus was on developing methods for achieving buildings systems with greater earthquake resistance (e.g., Moehle and Deierlein (2004)), the concepts of PBE have extended to other hazards, including wind, fire and tsunamis (e.g., Ciampoli et al (2011); Wang et al (2012); Attary et al (2017). Furthermore, the successful development of performance-based seismic engineering (PBSE) and its adoption in codes and practice over the past two decades has provided strong evidence for, not only the application of similar approaches for other natural and man-made hazards, but also riskconsistent multi-hazard design approaches (Gardoni and LaFave (2016); Suksuwan and Spence (2018); Kwag et al (2021). To successfully transfer this knowledge to wind engineering, the fundamental differences between seismic and wind effects for both structural and non-structural components, especially the envelope system, must be embraced while respecting the unique characteristics of wind loading and concurrent hazards (e.g., rainfall and debris impact).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, concrete is widely used in bridge structures, pile foundations, aircraft runways, dams and offshore platforms. However, these structures are subjected to various dynamic loads during their service, such as traveling loads [ 3 , 4 , 5 ], aircraft landings [ 6 ], waves [ 7 ], earthquakes [ 8 ], and other dynamic loading effects. These unavoidable human [ 9 , 10 , 11 ] and natural factors [ 12 ] present serious challenges to the safety of concrete structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many wind-resistant design methods are studied such as [1], [2], [3], and some devices are devised to suppress responses of wind loads [4], [5]. Moreover, some studies consider both seismic and wind loads to design a building [6], [7], [8]. To investigate the responses of a building for strong wind, the results of wind tunnel tests or measured data are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%