Objective: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare histological type of breast cancer. The cytological diagnosis of non-keratinising, poorly differentiated SCC is often difficult, and distinguishing it from invasive ductal carcinoma or apocrine carcinoma (AC) is especially challenging. We aimed to define the diagnostic cytological features of poorly differentiated SCC of the breast.
Methods:We studied the cytological findings of poorly differentiated SCC (n=10) and compared them to those of IDC (n=15) and AC (n=14). The following six cytological features were evaluated: streaming arrangement, nucleolar enlargement, dense nuclei, cannibalism, atypical keratinocytes and necrotic background.Results: SCC exhibited significantly higher frequencies of streaming arrangement (70% vs 6.7%, P=.002), nucleolar enlargement (80% vs 27%, P=.02), and necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.002) than invasive ductal carcinoma. The detection of two or three of these features yielded a higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (93%) for the diagnosis of SCC. Streaming arrangement (70% vs 0%, P<.001), cannibalism (60% vs 0%, P=.002), and a necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.047) were all significantly more frequent in SCC than in AC. When distinguishing SCC from AC, the presence of two or three of these features yielded a high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%).Conclusions: Cytological features such as a streaming arrangement, a necrotic background, nucleolar enlargement and cannibalism are useful indicators for the diagnosis of SCC of the breast. As such, greater attention should be paid to these morphological features in daily clinical practice. The cytological characteristics of apocrine breast carcinoma have been described as the presence of apocrine granules, an enlarged nucleolus and a low nucleus/cytoplasm ratio. The aim of this study was to clarify the cytological characteristics of poorly differentiated SCC of the breast to improve the quality of cytodiagnosis in comparing these characteristics with those of invasive ductal carcinoma and apocrine carcinoma of the breast.2 | ME TH ODS
| Immunohistochemical proceduresFormalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were examined immunohistochemically. After antigen retrieval (heat-treatment for 40 minutes at pH 9), the sections were incubated with anti-oestrogen-receptor antibodies (SPI, monoclonal; Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and anti-PgR antibodies (A9621A, monoclonal; Nichirei). After the endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 3% H 2 O 2 in distilled water, the slides were incubated with secondary antibody for 30 minutes. Then, the slides were subjected to peroxidase treatment using Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (MULTI; Nichirei) and a DAB substrate kit (Nichirei). Regarding HER2 (SV2-61c, monoclonal; Nichirei), immunohistochemical staining was performed according to the kit's protocol. The following were used as control groups: 15 cases with invasive ductal carcinoma, NOS and 14 cases with apocrine cancer.
| Cytological evaluationFine needle aspiration ...