1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0022336000033783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of ultrastructural features in etched conodonts

Abstract: Acid etching combined with scanning electron microscopy (S.E.M.) accentuates a variety of conodont microstructural patterns as compared to unetched specimens. External and internal organic layers surrounding apatitic lamellae are found with internal organic layers apparently thinner than their external counterparts. This may imply partial removal of the outermost organic layer prior to secretion of the next lamella. Etching also provides evidence of internally preserved striate ornament. Polygonal etch artifac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remains of the organic outer layer, similar to the etching surfaces illustrated by Burnett & Hall (1992), can be observed on the surface of conodonts with sugary textures. This textural type is similar to those described in detail by Konigshof (1992).…”
Section: B Colour Alteration Index Valuesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Remains of the organic outer layer, similar to the etching surfaces illustrated by Burnett & Hall (1992), can be observed on the surface of conodonts with sugary textures. This textural type is similar to those described in detail by Konigshof (1992).…”
Section: B Colour Alteration Index Valuesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Specimen BU 2636, frame width 32.5 mm. 1986; Burnett & Hall 1992;Sansom et al 1992), but heavily criticized (e.g. Blieck 1992; Kemp & Nicoll 1993, 1995a,b, 1996Schultze 1996;Forey & Janvier 1993;Janvier 1995Janvier , 1996a.…”
Section: (A) Lamellar Crown Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been examined at the interspeci c level on a geological time-scale by Conway Morris and Harper (1988) and interpreted as controlled by genome size. On the intraspeci c level, modi cations of cell imprint shape are linked to conodont element relief (Pierce & Langenheim 1970;Budurov 1976;McCracken & Nowlan 1989;Burnett & Hall 1992;Zhuravlev 1994); variations in imprint size have been attributed to varying ecological factors (Zhuravlev 1994(Zhuravlev , 1997. Imprint patterns demonstrate weak dependence on ontogeny (von Bitter & Norby 1994a, b;Zhuravlev 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%