1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02446619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of various adrenoreceptors for brain resistance to total ischemia

Abstract: Note. Significance of differences: lp<0.01, 2p<0.001 (compared with the control); 3p<0.01, 4p<0.001 (compared with the antagonist); Sp<0.05, ~p<0.01, 7p<0.001 (compared with clonidine).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proxodolol and labetalol exhibited no protective action with respect to the cerebral ischemia, while propranolol, prazosin, and especially clophelin produced a neuroprotective effect manifested by a considerable prolongation of the survival life of mice (see Table 1), in agreement with the published data for clophelin [6]. The neuroprotective action of clophelin was not significantly affected by proxodolol and labetalol, whereas the effects of prazosin and clophelin were added and propranolol even potentiated the action of clophelin (by a factor of2.4,p < 0.001).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Proxodolol and labetalol exhibited no protective action with respect to the cerebral ischemia, while propranolol, prazosin, and especially clophelin produced a neuroprotective effect manifested by a considerable prolongation of the survival life of mice (see Table 1), in agreement with the published data for clophelin [6]. The neuroprotective action of clophelin was not significantly affected by proxodolol and labetalol, whereas the effects of prazosin and clophelin were added and propranolol even potentiated the action of clophelin (by a factor of2.4,p < 0.001).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Not only pro-0007-4888/97/0010-0984518. The high NPE of methyldopa, guanabenz, and clonidine [1] is supported by extensive experimental data. Combined administration with epinephrine resulted in a clear-cut NPE, but for propranolol and prazosin it was significantly higher than for the antagonist itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…

Neuroprotective effect of epinephrine is revealed against the background of pmzosin, 13antagonists and their combinations protect against cerebral ischemia, c~2-Antagonists (but not 0~) block the neuroprotective effect of these combinations, methyldopa, guanabenz, clonidine, and oxymetazoline and decrease brain resistance to ischemia, a2-Adrenocept015 participate in the endogenic mechanism of brain resistance to ischemia and in the neuroprotective effect.

Epinephrine does not change the resistance of brain to total cerebral ischemia (CI), although its effect is manifested against the background of propranolol [1]. Shnilar effects of other adrenoceptor antagonists were not studied, c~2-Agonists produce a marked neuroprotective effect (NPE), i.e., the cerebral protective effect, which was demonstrated in various models of CI [1,2,[6][7][8]. It is generally accepted that to prove the role of cm~ain receptors in any physiological effect means to use blockade analysis.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coincidence of results obtained by twoby two independent methods (comparison of effects of selective receptor agonists and blockade with selective antagonists) indicates that NPE is mediated via GABA receptors of both types. It differs strikingly from NPE of catecholamines and their derivatives, which is mediated only via %-adrenoceptors [1]. However, the most important GABA effect, namely, the decrease in functional cerebral activity, is also realized via GABA receptors of both types [5,6, I 1 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%