2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant difference of opinion regarding the role of noggin in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have proposed that BMP2/4 or their antagonist noggin is responsible for the symptoms of FOP. However, dysfunction of BMPs and noggin in individuals with FOP remains to be elucidated (Cohen, 2002;Warman, 2002;Xu et al, 2000). The involvement of BMPs in ectopic bone formation in skeletal muscle has not been shown in human disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies have proposed that BMP2/4 or their antagonist noggin is responsible for the symptoms of FOP. However, dysfunction of BMPs and noggin in individuals with FOP remains to be elucidated (Cohen, 2002;Warman, 2002;Xu et al, 2000). The involvement of BMPs in ectopic bone formation in skeletal muscle has not been shown in human disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Characteristic anomalies of the cervical spine include large posterior elements, tall narrow vertebral bodies, and fusion of the facet joints between C2 and C7, findings that are strikingly similar to those seen in mice with homozygous deletions of the gene encoding Noggin, a secreted bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonist [26], supporting that increased BMP pathway signaling underlies the disease [25]. Although mutations in the Noggin gene have been reported [27–29], these findings could not be reconfirmed and are thought to be in error [3034]. …”
Section: Additional Skeletal Anomalies In Fopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, three novel mutations in NOG published by Semonin et al were subsequently challenged to be technical PCR errors due to the use of a nested PCR approach [28], [36]. Consequently, the necessity to present photographs and radiographs of the studied FOP patients has been emphasized to assure the correct clinical diagnosis and that the same phenotypes are compared [34]. Upon identification of heterozygous missense activating mutations in ACRV1 as the genetic cause of FOP in 2006, additional questions regarding the validity of NOG mutations in FOP were raised [15], [27], [30], [33], [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%