2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.104.075433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant enhancement of magnetic anisotropy and conductivity in GaN/CrI3 van der Waals heterostructures via electrostatic doping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the mean-field approximation overestimates the temperature, we use Monte Carlo simulations based on the Heisenberg model to predict T c . The spin Hamiltonian is given by 37 where J is the exchange constant, S m and S n are the spin vectors of m and n sites, A is the anisotropy energy and S z m is the spin component of the site m along the easy magnetization axis. Thus, the unit cell energies of FM, AFM-1, and AFM-2 states can be written as E FM = E 0 − 6 J 1 | S | 2 − 3 J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 E AFM−1 = E 0 + 2 J 1 | S | 2 + J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 E AFM−2 = E 0 − 6 J 1 | S | 2 + 3 J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 in which J 1 and J 2 are intralayer nearest-neighbour (NN) coupling constants and interlayer NN coupling constants as plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the mean-field approximation overestimates the temperature, we use Monte Carlo simulations based on the Heisenberg model to predict T c . The spin Hamiltonian is given by 37 where J is the exchange constant, S m and S n are the spin vectors of m and n sites, A is the anisotropy energy and S z m is the spin component of the site m along the easy magnetization axis. Thus, the unit cell energies of FM, AFM-1, and AFM-2 states can be written as E FM = E 0 − 6 J 1 | S | 2 − 3 J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 E AFM−1 = E 0 + 2 J 1 | S | 2 + J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 E AFM−2 = E 0 − 6 J 1 | S | 2 + 3 J 2 | S | 2 − A | S | 2 in which J 1 and J 2 are intralayer nearest-neighbour (NN) coupling constants and interlayer NN coupling constants as plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same phenomenon is also observed in VSe 2 49 and CrI 3 . 37 In contrast to hole doping, the increase of electron doping concentration causes a steady rise in J 2 and slight change in J 1 . It is obvious that doping can strengthen the FM coupling of the MgV 2 S 4 monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can find there is considerable difference between bottom and upper Cr-I bonds, and the largest difference is 0.13 Å in CrI 3 /Ir(111), indicating remarkable structural distortion in CrI 3 layer. This is different to the 2D substrates, on which the CrI 3 layer undergoes negligible deformation [26][27][28]. To evaluate the interlayer interaction, adsorption energies E ad are calculated by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4–6 MA also affects the magnetic configuration of 2D magnets 7–9 and the performance of nanoscale devices. 10,11 For example, an increased magnetocrystalline anisotropy (MCA) can transform the configuration of Fe 3 Sn 2 sheets from skyrmion bubbles to biskyrmion-like. 9 Regarding magnetic storage, MCA determines the energy consumption in the writing process and the information stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%