2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant Genetic Impacts Accompany an Urban Rat Control Campaign in Salvador, Brazil

Abstract: Rats thrive in human-dominated landscapes and have expanded to a near global distribution. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) contaminate food, damage infrastructure, and are reservoirs for zoonotic pathogens that cause human diseases. To limit these negative impacts, entities around the world implement intervention and control strategies designed to quickly and drastically reduce the number of rats in a population. While the primary goal of these interventions is to reduce rat numbers and their detrimental activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an increase in acceptance of rodenticide baits could be the main cause of a population crash, driven by the reduction of human-derived food resources during lockdown. Similarly to other reported cases, after such a mortality event, the genetic variation within the remaining population could be up to 90% lower than the original population 70 . Australia is currently one of the only countries in the world where rodenticide resistance has not yet been detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, an increase in acceptance of rodenticide baits could be the main cause of a population crash, driven by the reduction of human-derived food resources during lockdown. Similarly to other reported cases, after such a mortality event, the genetic variation within the remaining population could be up to 90% lower than the original population 70 . Australia is currently one of the only countries in the world where rodenticide resistance has not yet been detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Teasing apart direct and indirect drivers of transmission revealed the context within which transmission occurs and the relevant pathways governing it., This facilitates defining intervention targets, assessing their effectiveness[ 39 ], and prioritizing their implementation in the most vulnerable parts of the community. Indeed, while rodent control through rodenticide application does not appear to be effective (this study and [ 15 ]), socioeconomic[ 40 ] and sanitary [ 41 ]interventions have improved health outcomes for the urban poor in Brazil. Further, community-based approaches that involve residents and local stakeholders in designing and implementing risk-reduction interventions [ 42 ], have reduced malaria [ 43 ]and diarrheal disease risk in urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further, trash collection and rodent control services, where available, did not mitigate transmission risk. Rodenticide campaigns have scarcely been evaluated in urban slums, but they appear to be less effective here[ 15 ] compared to non-slum areas[ 34 ]. Similarly, efforts to control to Dengue fever risk through controlling Aedes mosquito populations has had limited success, due to the continuous financial and logistic investment required for interventions, which include spraying insecticides and removing mosquito breeding habitats [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, if large numbers of rats concurrently migrate, then a greater variety of individual genotypes within populations would have moved significant distances while under intense selective pressure 40 . It is reasonable then to assume there is some influence on the genetic profile of future urban rat populations 42,43 . While stressed rat populations may initially decrease due to loss of food and increased competition and muricide, rats breed rapidly, and should rapidly re-establish population equilibrium 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%