Signs and Symptoms of Concussion

Pujalte, George G.A.; Dekker, Timothy M.; Abadin, Andre A.; Jethwa, Trisha

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39582-7_3

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the authors indicated that these differences were likely due to reduced sensitivity to motion in children with poor reading fluency. While differences in motion sensitivity have been observed in subjects with dyslexia and after concussion (with vestibular changes), 43,44 we are not aware of any observed association between motion sensitivity and digital eyestrain.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

Digital Eyestrain and the Critical Fusion Frequency

Yan

Rosenfield²

2022

Optom Vis Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SIGNIFICANCE:Although the high prevalence of digital eyestrain has been well established, to date, there is no objective measurement of this condition. Previous studies have suggested that digital eyestrain may be associated with decreased critical fusion frequency, but the published evidence to support this association is sparse.PURPOSE: This study sought to determine whether symptoms of digital eyestrain after a sustained computer task are indeed associated with changes in critical fusion frequency. METHODS:The experiment was performed on 30 young visual-normal subjects. They attended two sessions, during which they undertook a 20-minute reading task. This comprised either reading random words from a tablet computer or a story from a printed children's book. Critical fusion frequency was measured both before and immediately after each of the reading tasks. In addition, the level of digital eyestrain was assessed by subjects completing a questionnaire regarding ocular and visual symptoms experienced during each of the reading trials. RESULTS:The mean increase in digital eyestrain symptoms after the digital and printed conditions was 11.37 (standard error of the mean [SEM], 2.23) and 4.40 (SEM, 1.34), respectively. Both the post-task symptom change ( P < .001) and the difference between the two reading conditions ( P = .004) were significant. The mean change in critical fusion frequency after the digital and printed conditions was −0.42 (SEM, 0.25) and −0.72 (SEM, 0.26), respectively. Neither the post-task change nor the difference between the two reading conditions was significant. In addition, when considering the digital condition only, no significant correlation was observed between the changes in critical fusion frequency and reported symptoms.CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the proposal that changes in critical fusion frequency can be used as an objective measure of eyestrain or other symptoms of digital eyestrain.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%