2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds for dual-lineage regeneration of osteochondral defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the case of laminate composites, the weak strength bonding between layers normally results in phase separation, not leading to tissue regeneration. Therefore, some reports focused on the use of single scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration [15,16]. These scaffolds ensure continuity between phases to avoid a barrier in the interface, together with biomaterials integrity, while mimicking the natural hierarchical structure of the osteochondral tissue.…”
Section: A Multifactorial Toolbox For Designing Tissue Engineering Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the case of laminate composites, the weak strength bonding between layers normally results in phase separation, not leading to tissue regeneration. Therefore, some reports focused on the use of single scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration [15,16]. These scaffolds ensure continuity between phases to avoid a barrier in the interface, together with biomaterials integrity, while mimicking the natural hierarchical structure of the osteochondral tissue.…”
Section: A Multifactorial Toolbox For Designing Tissue Engineering Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicon is a kind of trace element in the human body and is especially important for bone growth and development [31]. Extensive studies have confirmed that silicon-based biomaterials can not only promote osteogenesis formation but also stimulate angiogenesis via BMSC interaction [4, 32]. In recent years, an increasing number of researchers have paid attention to the cytotoxic mechanisms of silicon-doped materials; whether silicon nanomaterials or high concentration of free silicate, both can affect the cell viability to some extent [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical bone regeneration process, scaffolds placed in bone defect sites can lead to rapid initiation of efficient cell recruitment, adhesion, proliferation, and osteodifferentiation, which are important for bone regeneration and bone remodeling. 54,55 Eight weeks after treatment, the tibia plateau of the VCM-NPs/Gel group appeared flatter than that of the VCM/Gel group. The images of the 3D reconstruction in Figure 8C indicate a progressive increase in bone volume at the end of the 8th week post-treatment with VCM/Gel, VCM-NPs/Gel, and VCS, while it tended toward bone loss in the model groups.…”
Section: Radiographic Datamentioning
confidence: 98%