1977
DOI: 10.1364/ao.16.002013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon-carbide diffraction grating for the vacuum ultraviolet: feasibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is that there is no significant reflectance difference over the samples grown with approximate average ion energies in the 70 to 140 eV range, and the differences over the samples are within the measurement uncertainty. This is attributed to the highest sp 3 bonding that has been reported for films deposited with C ion energies in the ~50-150 eV range [35,36]. The other feature is that the films grown with ~70 eV or higher average energy have a substantially higher reflectance in the whole spectral range than the film grown with 0-V bias voltage, hence ~20-eV ion energy.…”
Section: A Euv Reflectancementioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One is that there is no significant reflectance difference over the samples grown with approximate average ion energies in the 70 to 140 eV range, and the differences over the samples are within the measurement uncertainty. This is attributed to the highest sp 3 bonding that has been reported for films deposited with C ion energies in the ~50-150 eV range [35,36]. The other feature is that the films grown with ~70 eV or higher average energy have a substantially higher reflectance in the whole spectral range than the film grown with 0-V bias voltage, hence ~20-eV ion energy.…”
Section: A Euv Reflectancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The reason may be that the average ion energy of sample 1, ~20 eV, even though insufficient to produce C films with highest sp 3 bonding, it is somewhat larger than the average atom energy in an ion-beam sputtering system such as in [29], which may reach only few eV; again, the smaller thickness of the IBD-C sample (24 nm thick) cannot explain a reflectance difference larger than 0.6% (relative) above 55 nm, whereas present sample 1 exceeds IBD C film reflectance an average of 16%. The large reflectance of the ta-C film compared to IBD C is attributed to the high sp 3 bonding content in ta-C films; in this way, diamond represents the limit of 100% sp 3 bonding. The proportion of sp 3 bonding content has been correlated with the energy of the ions in ta-C films [37], and for the present films grown with non-zero bias, the proportion of sp 3 bonding is expected to be in the ~80-85% [34].…”
Section: A Euv Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations