Organic photovoltaics (OPVs) presents an opportunity for low cost energy generation and niche applications such as collapsible electronics, solar sails, and weather resistant and curved solar roofs. [1] In recent years, OPV device performance has been consistently improving with recent power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) greater than 18%. [2,3] Unfortunately, these devices rely almost exclusively on materials that are synthetically challenging to produce and have limited large-scale potential. [4] In addition, the most promising OPV devices are fabricated by spin-coating with small active areas (<0.07 cm 2 ). While spin coating is an inexpensive and reproducible thin-film processing technique, it is very wasteful and does not scale to roll-to-roll (R2R) processes. Poly[[9-(1-octylnonyl)-9H-carbazole-2,7-diyl]-2,5-thiophenediyl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole-4,7 diyl2,5thiophenediyl]: [6,6]phenyl C 71 butyric acid methyl ester (PCDTBT:PC 71 BM)-based bulk heterojunction (BHJ) OPV have been found to strike a balance between high stability, low cost, ease of synthesis, and ease of large-scale manufacturing. [5,6] Unfortunately, the performance of PCDTBT:PC 71 BM-based OPV is limited by the poor absorption of the active layer in the NIR region. This issue can be addressed using a ternary additive, as has been effectively demonstrated with some other BHJ systems. [7,8] For example, silicon phthalocyanines (SiPc) are synthetically simple conjugated macrocycles that are chemically stable and absorb light in the NIR region. SiPcs have found application in n-type organic thin-film transistors [9,10] organic light-emitting diodes [11][12][13] and recently as nonfullerene acceptors and/or ternary additives in poly(hexyl thiophene) (P3HT)-based OPVs. [14][15][16] Originally proposed by Honda et al. [17,18] and others, [19] it was determined that the addition of as little as 3-10 wt% of bis(tri-n-hexylsilyl oxide) silicon phthalocyanine ((3HS) 2 -SiPc) would increase the photocurrent generation in the 685 nm range resulting in an increase in short circuit current ( J SC ) and PCE of up to 25 and 20%, respectively, for a P3HT/PC 61 BM-based OPV device. The authors found that at low additive loadings the (3HS) 2 -SiPc would migrate to the P3HT/PC 61 BM interface providing an energy cascade between the P3HT and the PC 61 BM but when the additive loading increased the (3HS) 2 -SiPc would crystalize and form its own phase leading to a drop in device performance. [20][21][22] Recently, Vebber et al. demonstrated that matching the solubility of the SiPc additive with that of the P3HT leads to optimized OPV performance further emphasizing the subtle