“…Prediction of muscle forces can provide valuable insight not only for understanding the control strategies employed by the central nervous system (CNS) (Contessa and Luca, 2013;Del Vecchio et al, 2018), but also for developing effective treatments for neuromusculoskeletal disorders (Shao et al, 2009;Fregly et al, 2012bFregly et al, , 2012aAllen et al, 2013;Pitto et al, 2019;Sauder et al, 2019) Since direct measurement of muscle force is invasive using current technology, computational techniques has been developed to generate muscle force estimates (Anderson and Pandy, 2001;Lloyd and Besier, 2003;Thelen et al, 2003;Buchanan et al, 2005;Shao et al, 2009) However, since the human musculoskeletal system possesses more muscles than degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) in the skeleton (i.e., the muscle redundancy problem), no unique solution for muscle exists unless muscle activity patterns are defined by measured EMG signals (Lloyd and Besier, 2003;Manal and Buchanan, 2003;Buchanan et al, 2005;Shao et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2012;Sartori et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2017), or assumptions are made about how muscles contribute to the joint moments, such as minimization of energetic cost (Anderson and Pandy, 2001; Ackermann and van den Bogert, 2010; S. Shourijeh and McPhee, 2014). EMG-driven musculoskeletal modeling is a computational approach for predicting muscle forces that can bypass the muscle redundancy problem while simultaneously allowing for calibration of unmeasurable musculotendon properties (e.g., optimal muscle fiber length) (Lloyd and Besier, 2003;Amarantini and Martin, 2004;Shao et al, 2009;Sartori et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2017).…”