2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-1154-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and differences between musculoskeletal simulations of OpenSim and AnyBody modeling system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of motion sensor cameras has enabled to track and capture minute movements in muscles. This has been proved to be beneficial for analysis of movements and subsequently treatment for musculoskeletal disorders can be evaluated [36]. Another major application of biomechanical software has been in the field of sports and defense research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of motion sensor cameras has enabled to track and capture minute movements in muscles. This has been proved to be beneficial for analysis of movements and subsequently treatment for musculoskeletal disorders can be evaluated [36]. Another major application of biomechanical software has been in the field of sports and defense research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronization of the kinematic and kinetic data was performed. Reflective markers were placed following the gait 2392 marker set (Kim et al, 2018). Each participant was fitted with thirty-nine (12.5 mm in diameter) reflective markers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in line with the idea that simulation software in biomechanics should be validated in multiple ways (Hicks et al, 2015), providing similar tools but different in their approach allows the community to cross-validate the different implementation of the algorithms. For instance, two papers (Kim et al, 2018;Trinler et al, 2019) recently compared the outputs of Anybody and OpenSim and came to different results. Although the authors provided plausible explanations for these differences, due to the closed-source nature of Anybody, they had to assume that the implementation of the algorithms are flawless in both software.…”
Section: Statement Of Needmentioning
confidence: 99%