“…The development of recent molecular methologies has allowed a qualitative improvement on chromosome researches of different biological taxa. Among them, the genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), originally developed for clinical studies (Kallioniemi et al, 1992 ), are now successfully applied for several other purposes, such as the identification of parental genomes in hybrids/allopolyploids (Bi and Bogart, 2006 ; Knytl et al, 2013 ; Symonová et al, 2013a , 2015 ; Doležálková et al, 2016 ; Majtánová et al, 2016 ), the detection of sex-specific content on homomorphic sex chromosomes (Ezaz et al, 2006 ; Altmanová et al, 2016 ; Rovatsos et al, 2016 ; Freitas et al, 2017 ) and the genome comparisons among related species (Valente et al, 2009 ; Symonová et al, 2013b ; Majka et al, 2016 ; Carvalho et al, 2017 ; Moraes et al, 2017 ). All these (and many other) studies proved that GISH and CGH technologies, despite representing rather “rough” molecular tools, may be successful in providing clues about the genome evolution, with their resolution being based on the differential distribution of already divergent genome-specific repetitive DNA classes (Kato et al, 2005 ; Chester et al, 2010 ), as these sequences are generally highly abundant in eukaryotic genomes and display faster evolutionary rates than the single-copy ones (Charlesworth et al, 1994 ; Cioffi and Bertollo, 2012 ; López-Flores and Garrido-Ramos, 2012 ).…”