2021
DOI: 10.1109/tsc.2018.2839741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity-Maintaining Privacy Preservation and Location-Aware Low-Rank Matrix Factorization for QoS Prediction Based Web Service Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they are different from each other in objective functions or learning algorithms, they all adopt an L 2 norm-oriented Loss that is highly sensitive to outliers [25,27,28]. To make an LF model less sensitive to outlier data, Zhu et al propose to adopt an L 1 -norm-oriented Loss [24]. However, an LF model with an L 1 norm-oriented Loss has possibly multiple solution spaces because L 1 norm is less smooth than L 2 norm.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they are different from each other in objective functions or learning algorithms, they all adopt an L 2 norm-oriented Loss that is highly sensitive to outliers [25,27,28]. To make an LF model less sensitive to outlier data, Zhu et al propose to adopt an L 1 -norm-oriented Loss [24]. However, an LF model with an L 1 norm-oriented Loss has possibly multiple solution spaces because L 1 norm is less smooth than L 2 norm.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig . 1 illustrates the differences between L 1 norm-oriented and L 2 norm-oriented Losses: a) The former is less sensitive to outliers than the latter, thereby enhancing the robustness of a resultant model [22][23][24][25] as shown in Fig. 1(a); and b) The latter is smoother than the former when the predictions and ground truth data are close, thereby enhancing the stability of a resultant model [26] as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the model-based CF [13][14] is another popular method for QoS prediction, which builds a model based on users' historical QoS performance to predict the unknown Qos values. Considering the problem of data sparsity, [15] proposed a matrix factorization model that integrates QoS time series, and [16] proposed a Locationaware Low-rank Matrix Factorization for QoS prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multimedia packets need correctness, real time data, and sequence in order to maintain streaming quality as compared to general services [15], [16]. The service quality for multimedia applications declines while meeting the QoS demands due to mobility and bandwidth variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%