2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity of nutrient uptake and root dimensions of Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir at two contrasting sites in Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we conclude that our in situ measurements of natural variation in soil N provide a relatively accurate index of seedling soil N environments over the duration of the treatments (2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). Lastly, growth or uptake responses to N form, or nitrate reductase activity, have been reported for some of our study species and these patterns are generally consistent with the pattern that we documented (Truax et al 1994;Rothstein et al 1996;Bauer and Berntson 2001;Miller and Hawkins 2007;Yanai et al 2009;Scott and Rothstein 2011;Tang et al 2012; but for white ash, see Scott and Rothstein 2011). Thus, we conclude that our statistical modeling of growth responses to natural variation in soil N forms provided an accurate assessment of species N-form specificity.…”
Section: Fig 5 Species Responses Tosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus we conclude that our in situ measurements of natural variation in soil N provide a relatively accurate index of seedling soil N environments over the duration of the treatments (2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). Lastly, growth or uptake responses to N form, or nitrate reductase activity, have been reported for some of our study species and these patterns are generally consistent with the pattern that we documented (Truax et al 1994;Rothstein et al 1996;Bauer and Berntson 2001;Miller and Hawkins 2007;Yanai et al 2009;Scott and Rothstein 2011;Tang et al 2012; but for white ash, see Scott and Rothstein 2011). Thus, we conclude that our statistical modeling of growth responses to natural variation in soil N forms provided an accurate assessment of species N-form specificity.…”
Section: Fig 5 Species Responses Tosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We are not aware of a study that has explored the extent to which aspen and conifer trees directly affect soil C turnover and microbial biomass through their rhizodeposits. Higher specific root length (SRL) of aspen compared to conifers [50,51,53,92,93] suggests a higher volume of soil exploited and affected by rhizosphere processes like root exudation and detritus input [94]. This could suggest more dynamic belowground processes under aspen.…”
Section: Rooting Pattern and Rhizosphere Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this has not always been the case. For example, published estimates of specific root length (m g À1 ) in fine roots of Quercus alba vary by an order of magnitude (Comas et al, 2002;Yanai et al, 2009;McCormack et al, 2012). Among these studies and many others, the portion of the fine-root pool on which measurements are made ranges from individual root tips to small root branches or to all roots below a fixed diameter cutoff (Comas et al, 2002;Pregitzer et al, 2002;Guo et al, 2008b;Holdaway et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%