2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple equations for predicting the rotational ductility of fiber-reinforced-polymer strengthened reinforced concrete joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 23, prior to cracking, the displacement of various test pieces develops slowly; the relationship between displacement and load is approximately linear; this indicates that the test pieces are at elastic working state; after cracking and before yielding, the slopes of curves of various test pieces reduce gradually; this is because the cracking with the chord weakens the overall lateral stiffness of the test pieces and makes the curve gradually slow down; after the test pieces yield, the displacement increases quickly with the application of the load; the curves of the test pieces have smooth sections; this indicates that the test pieces have better deformation capacity; after the ultimate load is reached, the increase of loading becomes impossible; the displacement further increases and indicates that the test pieces failed. In fact, curve variation rule of Figure 23 is similar to that of other types of reinforced concrete members [26][27][28]. At failure, the average strain values of the measuring points 4, 8, and 12 of group 1 and group 2 are greater than the yield strain values, while the average strain values of 3-A and 3-B are less than the yield strain values.…”
Section: Load-displacement Curvesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In Figure 23, prior to cracking, the displacement of various test pieces develops slowly; the relationship between displacement and load is approximately linear; this indicates that the test pieces are at elastic working state; after cracking and before yielding, the slopes of curves of various test pieces reduce gradually; this is because the cracking with the chord weakens the overall lateral stiffness of the test pieces and makes the curve gradually slow down; after the test pieces yield, the displacement increases quickly with the application of the load; the curves of the test pieces have smooth sections; this indicates that the test pieces have better deformation capacity; after the ultimate load is reached, the increase of loading becomes impossible; the displacement further increases and indicates that the test pieces failed. In fact, curve variation rule of Figure 23 is similar to that of other types of reinforced concrete members [26][27][28]. At failure, the average strain values of the measuring points 4, 8, and 12 of group 1 and group 2 are greater than the yield strain values, while the average strain values of 3-A and 3-B are less than the yield strain values.…”
Section: Load-displacement Curvesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The ABAQUS user manual describes the expansion angle ψ, eccentricity e, ultimate strength ratio of biaxial bearing to uniaxial bearing f b0 /f c0 , ratio of second stress invariants K and viscosity coefficient m. The physical meaning of the parameters and the reference values were provided. Many researchers (Jiang et al, 2005;Tahnat et al, 2020) have used these parameters, and the results obtained are in good agreement with the experimental tests. The parameters of the plastic damage model are shown in Table 4 below.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Concretesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The physical meaning of the parameters and the reference values were provided. Many researchers (Jiang et al ., 2005; Tahnat et al ., 2020) have used these parameters, and the results obtained are in good agreement with the experimental tests. The parameters of the plastic damage model are shown in Table 4 below.…”
Section: The Establishment Of a Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using concrete plastic damage model, a set of parameters need to be determined in the modeling process to capture the mechanical behavior of concrete accurately. The default values of these parameters are taken from Halahla et al (2019) and Tahnat et al (2020), and the simulated results obtained by using these parameters were in good agreement with the experimental results. These parameters were also used in this paper, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Experiments Overviewsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The default values of these parameters are taken from Halahla et al. (2019) and Tahnat et al. (2020), and the simulated results obtained by using these parameters were in good agreement with the experimental results.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelsupporting
confidence: 60%